Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [dsdp-tcf-dev] TCF Disassembly Service

Hej Torleif,

> Should disassemblers be implemented in the front-ends of debuggers? Is
> this the case with eclipse?
> I can see the advantages of not having to send both the object file
and
> source files over to TCF agents
> but there is value in reusing a Disassembly service for different
> front-ends.

I totally agree with you that there is value in reusing a disassembly
service for different front-end.  We (Wind River) is currently
discussing a disassembly service.  Once we have done some more
prototyping we will document the service in the Eclipse TCF repository.
I would be happy to discuss the service definition before then if you
like.

Thanks,
Felix

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dsdp-tcf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-tcf-dev-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sandnes, Torleif
> Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 11:50 PM
> To: DSDP TCF dev list
> Subject: [dsdp-tcf-dev] TCF Disassembly Service
> 
> I have looked for a TCF Disassembly service on google, in the archives
> of this mailing list,
> in the source of the eclipse tcf plugin and in the C agent
> implementation. The only reference I have
> seen to such a service is on this blog
> 
> http://nokiacarbideoneclipse.blogspot.com/2009/09/cdt-edc-
> breakpoints.html
> 
> Should disassemblers be implemented in the front-ends of debuggers? Is
> this the case with eclipse?
> I can see the advantages of not having to send both the object file
and
> source files over to TCF agents
> but there is value in reusing a Disassembly service for different
> front-ends.
> 
> Has there been any thoughts on this when defining TCF?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Torleif Sandnes
> Atmel Norway
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-tcf-dev mailing list
> dsdp-tcf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tcf-dev


Back to the top