[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [dsdp-tcf-dev] TCF Disassembly Service
|
Hej Torleif,
> Should disassemblers be implemented in the front-ends of debuggers? Is
> this the case with eclipse?
> I can see the advantages of not having to send both the object file
and
> source files over to TCF agents
> but there is value in reusing a Disassembly service for different
> front-ends.
I totally agree with you that there is value in reusing a disassembly
service for different front-end. We (Wind River) is currently
discussing a disassembly service. Once we have done some more
prototyping we will document the service in the Eclipse TCF repository.
I would be happy to discuss the service definition before then if you
like.
Thanks,
Felix
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dsdp-tcf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-tcf-dev-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sandnes, Torleif
> Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 11:50 PM
> To: DSDP TCF dev list
> Subject: [dsdp-tcf-dev] TCF Disassembly Service
>
> I have looked for a TCF Disassembly service on google, in the archives
> of this mailing list,
> in the source of the eclipse tcf plugin and in the C agent
> implementation. The only reference I have
> seen to such a service is on this blog
>
> http://nokiacarbideoneclipse.blogspot.com/2009/09/cdt-edc-
> breakpoints.html
>
> Should disassemblers be implemented in the front-ends of debuggers? Is
> this the case with eclipse?
> I can see the advantages of not having to send both the object file
and
> source files over to TCF agents
> but there is value in reusing a Disassembly service for different
> front-ends.
>
> Has there been any thoughts on this when defining TCF?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Torleif Sandnes
> Atmel Norway
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-tcf-dev mailing list
> dsdp-tcf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tcf-dev