RE: [dsdp-tcf-dev] RE: [Bug 301578] Orbit should offer JSON tools

["Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I think JSON is really simple (by design) and having
a "private" parser is not much overhead, especially
if it is tuned for its use.

There are 18 JSON java implementations listed at json.org.

Unless there is a really good reason to switch I'd keep
the JSON implementation as part of TCF.... less dependencies
are good..



Michael
-- 
Michael Scharf, Principal Technologist, Wind River
direct +49.6221.586.0139 mobile +49.1512.7537.6269 fax +49.6221.436.805 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dsdp-tcf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:dsdp-tcf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Oberhuber, Martin
> Sent: Wednesday, 03 February, 2010 09:40
> To: Tarassov, Eugene
> Cc: DSDP TCF dev list
> Subject: [dsdp-tcf-dev] RE: [Bug 301578] Orbit should offer JSON tools
> 
> Thanks Eugene.
> 
> Of course, if JSON works fine in TCF today, there is no value in
> switching.
> Could anybody think of any value, i.e. is anything missing from
> TCF-JSON?
> 
> Thanks,
> Martin
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tarassov, Eugene 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 4:01 AM
> To: Oberhuber, Martin
> Cc: 'DSDP TCF dev list'
> Subject: RE: [Bug 301578] Orbit should offer JSON tools
> 
> Hi Martin,
> 
> To consider alternative JSON implementation we would need a 
> proof that:
> 1. It is faster then current implementation - JSON is part of
> time-critical path in TCF; 2. It has no dependencies beyond standard
> Java; 3. It can be extended to support unformatted binary data blocs -
> aka TCF Zero Copy protocol.
> 
> Regards,
> Eugene 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Oberhuber, Martin
> Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 11:35 AM
> To: Tarassov, Eugene
> Cc: DSDP TCF dev list
> Subject: FW: [Bug 301578] Orbit should offer JSON tools
> 
> Hi Eugene and all TCF committers,
> 
> Would it be beneficial for TCF Java side to leverage JSON 
> Utilities from
> the external lib (see below) rather than Cooking our own JSON?
> 
> Thanks,
> Martin 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 8:11 PM
> To: Oberhuber, Martin
> Subject: [Bug 301578] Orbit should offer JSON tools
> 
> 
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=301578
> Product/Component: Orbit / bundles
> 
> --- Comment #1 from Austin Riddle <austin.riddle@xxxxxxxx> 2010-02-02
> 14:11:09 EST --- Sorry to be terse in my last post.  The JSON code
> approved for use in CQ3603 would be useful for reference in a RAP
> contribution that provides Google Visualizations.  Currently the
> contribution contains the code in its own bundles, which is less than
> ideal.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> --
> Configure bugmail: 
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching
> the assignee of the bug.
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-tcf-dev mailing list
> dsdp-tcf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tcf-dev
>