RE: [dsdp-pmc] FW: Nag Note for Project Status Bugzillas

["Gaff, Doug" <doug.gaff@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I spoke with Craig about that at EclipseCon. He said that the solution
the platform team proposed didn't solve MTJ's problem. I think he had
the action to try to get the platform team's attention again before I
tried to escalate it.


-----Original Message-----
From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Hildum Eric-XFQ473
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 5:52 PM
To: DSDP PMC list
Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] FW: Nag Note for Project Status Bugzillas

Doug,

I believe that there is a longstanding bug against JDT that we need for
preprocessor support. Christian and Craig have the details. Not a red
flag, but not something we should ignore either. 


Eric Hildum
Senior Product Manager, Mobile Developer Tools & SDK
Developer Platforms and Services
Ecosystem and Market Development
Motorola
Direct: +1-408-541-6809
 
809 11th Avenue
Sunnyvale, CA 94089
USA

-----Original Message-----
From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Gaff, Doug
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 11:08
To: DSDP PMC list
Subject: [dsdp-pmc] FW: Nag Note for Project Status Bugzillas

Hi folks,

I'll be at the Planning Council meeting next Wed. TmL, TM and MTJ: are
there any red flags you want me to raise on your projects around the
Must Do's?

Doug

-----Original Message-----
From: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David
M Williams
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 10:53 AM
To: cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] Nag Note for Project Status
Bugzillas

As we come up to the end of M7, our Galileo readiness chart, at 
http://www.eclipse.org/projects/galileo_status.php 
needs much attention. 

If we went on the state of the table right now to decide who was "in" 
Galileo, based on "must do" items for this point in cycle, there would 
only be 10 of the 35 projects. 

ACTF Visualization
BIRT 
Data Tools 
Equinox 
GMF 
M2T
Platform 
Subversive 
TPTP
TmL

Congratulations to them ... but even then, those 10 still need to do
some 
work for "RC1" items. 

I'm fairly sure some of these just need book-keeping ... for example, 
according to the chart, CDT has not yet declared their intent to be in 
Galileo! 

For other, non-book-keeping items, if you have not done it by M7 (and it

was due by M7) you should mark as "won't fix" and explain why.
Otherwise, 
when the Planning Council is reviewing them next week, we'll have to 
assume you not only did not do the item, but you are also not 
communicating in a cross-project, good-Eclipse-citizen fashion ... which

is of course the fundamental "must-do" requirement of our simultaneous 
release! 

Please update the bugzillas by end-of-day Tuesday, so the Planning
Council 
will have accurate data to discuss when we meet on Wednesday. 

Thank you,


_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
dsdp-pmc mailing list
dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc
_______________________________________________
dsdp-pmc mailing list
dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc