+1 for Eclipse DSDP Project
In keeping with Dave’s beer theme, how about we rebrand as “Delicious
Suds Delivery Platform”
From:
dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of CLONINGER ERIC-DCP874
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 3:47 PM
To: DSDP PMC list
Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] plugin.properties providerName
+1 for Eclipse DSDP Project
From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Oberhuber, Martin
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 1:42 PM
To: DSDP PMC list
Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] plugin.properties providerName
Hi Eric,
AFAIK the providerName must be "in sync" with the icon.
If we have ONE icon for all of DSDP, we also need ONE providerName. For
instance,
"Eclipse DSDP Project" or
"Eclipse.org - DSDP" or
"Eclipse.org - Device Software Development
Platform"
I'm not sure if discussion concluded on any recommended pattern for
the providerName.
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of
Technical Staff, Wind River
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of CLONINGER ERIC-DCP874
Sent: Dienstag, 28. April 2009 19:07
To: DSDP PMC list
Subject: [dsdp-pmc] plugin.properties providerName
Several
months ago, there was a discussion on cross-platform about putting
project-specific names in the plugin.properties and feature.properties providerName
fields. I created a bug for TmL to do this work.
It
doesn't appear that many projects are adopting this strategy. Are other DSDP
projects, especially those on the Galileo release train, planning to make these
changes? If so, what format are you planning to use?
--
Eric Cloninger
Sr. Product Manager, MOTODEV Studio
Eclipse DSDP/TmL Project Lead
ericc@xxxxxxxxxxxx
