RE: [dsdp-pmc] CQ process for Orbit dependencies

["Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Eric,

 

you need to file a "piggyback" CQ:

 

Request to redistribute commons.net and oro, referencing the original Orbit CQ for those packages.

 

Cheers,

--

Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River

Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member

http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm

 

 

---

From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of CLONINGER ERIC-DCP874
Sent: Mittwoch, 28. Jänner 2009 22:50
To: DSDP PMC list
Subject: [dsdp-pmc] CQ process for Orbit dependencies

[I could've sworn this was discussed in an email chain, but I can't find it in the archives.  If it was discussed in a PMC call, it's not in the notes for the last 9 months. It could be all in my head...]

 

For TmL 0.3, we are adding a feature that has a dependency on Orbit. Specifically apache.oro and apache.commons.net.  The code was created by a committer on the project (Otavio Ferranti).

 

Do we need to file a CQ for this dependency or is it sufficient that Orbit already has its' IP approved?

 

Thanks

 

--

Eric Cloninger

Sr. Product Manager, MOTODEV Studio

Eclipse Tools for Mobile Linux Project Lead

ericc@xxxxxxxxxxxx, +1 408-731-6500