RE: [dsdp-pmc] Please Vote: MTJ Release Review

["Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Christian,

I definitely think you're ready to complete your MTJ
Reboot with this 0.9 release!

+1 from Martin Oberhuber for the Review.

I did notice a couple of things though:

* Title slide references dev.process v2.3.1 of Jan 17,2007 
  but current is Rev 2.4 of August 20, 2008 -- are you 
  allowed to release by the old process ?

* Slide 5 - why "MTJ Reboot _proposed_ plan"? I think you did
  all that already?

* On your projectplan,
  http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=dsdp.mtj
  I'm surprised that most bug references are BOTH proposed AND committed
  I believe they should only be one of (proposed, committed)?

* Slide 6 - features - are the "improvements" compared to MTJ 0.7
  or compared to EclipseME ? You did base 0.9 on the EclipseME
  code, no?

* Slide 8 - "JAD Attributed" should be "JAD Attributes" ?

* Slide 11 - End-of-life 
  Shouldn't that talk about EOL'ing all the MTJ 0.7 APIs?
  And adding EclipseME / MTJ 0.9 APIs instead?

* Slide 15 - Schedule
  "and the following weeks" should be "in the following weeks" ?

* Slide 16 - Communities
  4000 downloads of *each* N-build? Or in total? This is a very
  high number. The #downloads for one specific milestone would
  likely be more representative.

* Slide 16 - Press release - is there a link to it?

* Slide 17 - yellow color hard to read

* IP Log:
  http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/mtj/ipLog.php
  Are "Gang Ma" and "Gang(Allen) Ma" the same person?

Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Christian Kurzke
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 12:06 AM
> To: DSDP PMC list
> Subject: Re: [dsdp-pmc] Please Vote: MTJ Release Review
> 
> Hi Mark,  (and others)
> 
> 
> the team posted a preliminary version of the slides here:
> http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/mtj/reviews/MTJ_0.9_Release_Review
_v0.2.pdf
> we will need to fine tune and add the blanks until the review 
> meeting, 
> but - this is in a overview the scope of the presentation.
> 
> Please give the formal vote, so we can officially schedule 
> the meeting.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -Christian
> 
> 
> 
> Mark Rogalski wrote:
> >
> > Do you have some preliminary release review slides you can 
> distribute 
> > to us?
> >
> > <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-pmc mailing list
> dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc
>