Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[dsdp-pmc] RE: Checkpoint review

Title: Bjorn Freeman

That’s fine with me.  It’s certainly more consistent.


Mika:  you should send an email to the dsdp pmc indicating that you would like to do a release review for the 0.7 release of MTJ with some supporting detail (features, test plan, etc).  If you still intend to release in October, we need to move fast to get this scheduled.  Otherwise, we can discuss this in our Nov 2 PMC meeting.




From: Bjorn Freeman-Benson [mailto:bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 12:13 PM
To: Gaff, Doug
Cc: Bjorn Freeman-Benson; mika.hoikkala@xxxxxxxxx; dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Checkpoint review


Well, now I'm not sure. I thought I had told others that any X.Y (including 0.Y) release requires a Release Review. But now that you question me I wonder if I told someone else that 0.Y releases do not require a Review. Hmm...  I think we should have all X.Y releases have a Release Review. A X.Y.Z release (such as 3.2.1 bug fix release after 3.2) does not require a Review.

- Bjorn

Gaff, Doug wrote:

I thought you were going to release a 0.7 release first?  I don’t think you need to do any kind of review for incubation releases.  Bjorn, is that correct?


Back to the top