RE: [dsdp-mtj-dev] MTJ only on Galileo

["Fraleigh Lori-PJGF34" <lori.fraleigh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

It's also my understanding that many projects will continue to build for both Ganymede and Galileo until after SR1 in September.  It would be good to know how hard it actually is to continue support for both.

 

Lori

---

From: dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Craig Setera
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 10:28 AM
To: Mobile Tools for The Java Platform mailing list
Subject: Re: [dsdp-mtj-dev] MTJ only on Galileo

I have a concern with removing support unless it is necessary.  This assumes that users will either:

1) Be able to immediately jump to 3.5 (not have plugins that depend on 3.4)
2) Maintain two Eclipse installations

Our internal tools are an example of #1.  We are currently broken on 3.5.  While I hope to resolve that issue, until then I'm either stuck with two installations of Eclipse or I can't use MTJ.  I think this is a very common occurrence for users early in the new version release cycle.  I'd really like to see us maintain N-1 support if at all possible.  Throwing out support for anything prior to 3.4 seems like a no brainer, but 3.4 and 3.5 support would be nice.

What would it take to run a regular build against Ganymede to validate it is still building?

Craig


On 5/11/09 10:45 AM, Hildum Eric-XFQ473 wrote:

As Galileo has always been the target for MTJ, I have no problem with dropping the Ganymede support at this point.

 

Eric Hildum

Senior Product Manager, Mobile Developer Tools & SDK

Developer Platforms and Services

Ecosystem and Market Development

Motorola

Direct: +1-408-541-6809

 

809 11th Avenue

Sunnyvale, CA 94089

USA

 

---

From: dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Paula Gustavo-WGP010
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 7:05
To: Mobile Tools for The Java Platform mailing list
Subject: [dsdp-mtj-dev] MTJ only on Galileo

Hi MTJ,

In some o four past meeting we talked about the possibility of keeping MTJ support both on ganymede and galileo. With the addition of all Pulsar tasks, it end up that current MTJ is only building against Galileo. MTJ runtime feature still installs/run on Ganymede, but there is no guarantee that it will continue installing since we are not building against Ganymede anymore.

I will like to hear some thoughts about that. Is it ok for everyone to keep only Galileo support or Ganymede is mandatory for MTJ??? A single target platform makes our life much easier in the build environment. Since I maintain the build environment I would vote for Galileo-only J… but I don’t want to take that decision alone

J

Gep (back from vacation)

_______________________________________________
dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev