Re: [dsdp-mtj-dev] MTJ Build Refactoring

[Craig Setera <craigjunk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm not entirely certain what has changed in this versus what was  
there before.  Is it basically splitting functionality into separate  
builders?

On Apr 27, 2009, at 7:43 AM, David Marques wrote:

> Hi Craig,
>
>   You are right! How does it look to you ??
>
> Regards,
>
> David Marques
>
> Craig Setera wrote:
> > Is the idea here that each major "builder" box would truly be an  
> > Eclipse incremental builder implementation?
> >
> > On Apr 24, 2009, at 3:26 PM, David Marques wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Everyone,
> > >
> > > I just finished the activity diagram for the build proposal, it is  
> > > on (http://wiki.eclipse.org/DSDP/MTJ/Discussion/Refactoring/ 
> > > build). The main change to the previous solution is the extraction  
> > > of a package builder from within the preverification builder. Now  
> > > only the package builder handles the packaging either for the  
> > > runtime JAR or the deployment JARs.
> > >
> > > Please take a look at it and send feedback.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > David Marques
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
> > > dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
> > dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
> dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev