[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Validating Aggregator fails because of legacy update site -> MAT


But surely such an update should not occur.

IMHO the sequence of events is:

a) develop a new contribution and build it
b) change the *.aggrcon to reference the new contribution
c) submit the changed *.aggrcon for Gerrit build approval
d) commit the changed *.aggrcon for polled build usage

Surely the only hazard is that if a build occurs at the 'same' instant that the GIT commit occurs, it is uncertain whether old or new contribution is used? But there is no indeterminate intermediate.

Any development process that updates an already contributed repo is not playing fair.

ÂÂÂ Regards

ÂÂÂ ÂÂÂ Ed Willink

On 24/05/2017 08:46, Mickael Istria wrote:
Hi Krum,

As far as I understand, the "legacy update site" issue may just be the way aggragation failed because of the update, but not the cause of the failure. We can imagine the during the aggregation process, your repo was updated (update of repo during aggregation isn't supported by the aggregation process), so it put aggregation in an inconsistent state and the aggregator wrongly reported that the cause is usage of legacy update site.
With last message from Alexander saying everything is working now, I think we can assume everything is back to work and stop worrying about it.


cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit

Virus-free. www.avast.com