Sam's interpretation is technically correct, but we don't do that
in practice.
You only need a PB for third party content that you redistribute.
We've made some progress on eliminating PBs (at least in the OSGi
context), but we're not there yet.
Wayne
On 08/05/17 03:34 PM, Ed Merks wrote:
No, my reading is that you need a PB CQ for what you
redistribute. Of course the need for a PB CQ is questionably
stupid at best in the first place and I've offered to automate
the whole process of tracking such dependencies. But alas, to
no avail...
On 08.05.2017 20:58, Sam Davis wrote:
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation