Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Problems with Simrel contributionre: org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench 
Hi
Pedantically, adding and exploiting @noimplement requires a major version change anyway, but if we did that for every "oops, that should not have been API" we would always need major version changes.
Practically, I find that the improved API checking for name addition in M6 makes non-major-change evolution very very hard. For OCL, which has been fairly stable moving to 6.3.0, I found that I needed some API filters that I could not really justify for 'mad bad users'. I think we need a new policy to express the boundary between irresponsible extension code and irresponsible extensions to allow minor versions to remain useful.
(It would also be good to remind committers that there was once a policy of escalating approvals that required two committers and two PMCs to ok an RC4 change. The problem change seems to have been unreviewed at RC4.)
I vote to fix rather than ripple the major version bug. To accommodate the wrong M6 version, consumers may need to widen to a [1.0.0,3.0.0) dependency bound for M6 and possibly M7 reverting back to [1.0.0,2.0.0) at RC1. Or just no bound at all as I suspect a few projects have done. 

    Regards

        Ed Willink

On 13/03/2017 14:49, Tom Schindl wrote:

Well API-Tooling is correct! There is a method added to an interface who
was NOT marked @noimplement, so this is a source breaking change (binary
is ok!).

In general I think we should (re)instruct all our committers to think
twice before upgrading the major version of a bundle and get in touch
with their project leads, as breaking changes should only happen very
very rarely.

Tom

On 13.03.17 15:40, Brian de Alwis wrote:

I don't understand why the API tooling recommended a major increment
since there was no breaking change — they were all API additions.

Given that it's been in place for 10 days, my vote is to recover from
the mistake and fix the version number.

Brian.



On 13-Mar-2017, at 6:07 AM, Simon Scholz <simon.scholz@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:simon.scholz@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

Hello,

from my side I´ve just been following the checks of the API Base Line
tooling accroding to the changes in the generated code of the
MUiFactory class.
So at least we should add the noimplement flag to the MUiFactory to
avoid further major version increments due to the missing noimplement
flag.
But for now I think we should stick to the version increment to avoid
breaking clients who might have implemented MUiFactory, which anyways
is unlikely.

Regards,

Simon

On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 6:09 PM, Ed Willink <ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

     Hi

     Chaotic major versions seem undesirable, so since the major
     version has not yet made it to +4 on any milestone it seems
     appropriate to revert it; preferably for M6, but certainly for M7.

     We aggregate to find inconsistencies. We found one, the platform
     was wrong, the platform should correct, not everyone else.

     Note that if the platform fails to revert, downstream projects
     that offer multi-release compatibility must forever remember to
     specify an irregular 1.0.0,3.0.0 range for this plugin.

     Note also that if PDE requires a major version change it usually
     means you should revise your code to avoid the major version, not
     just throw a major version to make the irritating error go away.

     Note also again that major version chnages should be announced so
     that consumers and experts have an opportunity to comment in a
     more timely fashion.

         Regards

             Ed Willink


     On 11/03/2017 16:52, Daniel Megert wrote:

     Thanks Tom!  That was my thinking too. So, that class should be
     marked as @noimplement in the model, because next time, PDE Tools
     will again ask the developer to increment the major version.

     Unfortunately, at this point, reverting the major version
     increase seems to do more harm than having a few bundles adjust
     their dependency. If someone disagrees, please let us know asap.

     Dani



     From:        Tom Schindl <tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
     <mailto:tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
     To:        Cross project issues
     <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
     <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
     Date:        11.03.2017 17:35
     Subject:        Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Problems with
     Simrel contribution        re: org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench
     Sent by:        cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
     <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
     ------------------------------------------------------------------------



     Under NO cricumstance this API is/has/should be implemented by
     clients! IIRC it should be called at by none e4 internals. So
     this version increase is just plain wrong!

     Tom (guy who was in charge of the model)

     Von meinem iPhone gesendet

     Am 11.03.2017 um 16:22 schrieb Daniel Megert
     <_daniel_megert@xxxxxx.com_ <mailto:daniel_megert@xxxxxxxxxx>>:

     You're right Ed. At least in the SDK there's no re-export of that
     bundle.

     Dani



     From:        Ed Willink <_ed@xxxxxxxxxx.uk_
     <mailto:ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
     To:        _cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org_
     <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
     Date:        11.03.2017 11:01
     Subject:        Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Problems with
     Simrel contribution
     Sent by:        _cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@eclipse.org_
     <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
     ------------------------------------------------------------------------



     Hi

     Correction. I misread the icons in the Plugin dependency view.
     Nothing
     in my workspace re-exports org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench, so
     a major
     version change should be a simple MANIFEST.MF update for consumers.

        Regards

            Ed Willink

     On 11/03/2017 08:58, Ed Willink wrote:
     > Hi
     >
     > On the one hand, this looks like the normal excitement that occurs
     > when a plugin has a major version increase; every consumer must
     follow
     > suit on its dependency bounds. However it is surprising that no
     > announcement has been made, particularly so close to M6.
     >
     > On the other hand, there are many plugins that re-export
     > org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench and so they too must also
     incur a
     > major version increment. org.eclipse.ui.ide is one of them and
     I doubt
     > we want a major version increment there.
     >
     > Presumably a typo then. I suggest nobody apart from the
     platform team
     > reacts.
     >
     >     Regards
     >
     >         Ed Willink
     >
     > On 11/03/2017 08:19, Eike Stepper wrote:
     >> Hi,
     >>
     >> It appears that _https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/88492/_
     <https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/88492/>incremented the
     >> major version of the org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench plugin.
     There
     >> are some other commits in the context of
     >> _https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=484398_
     <https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=484398>but none of
     them
     >> seems to justify a major version increment. Maybe I overlooked
     >> something historic that justifies it. Is it justifiable that the
     >> major version of this plugin was incremented, and if so, what
     is the
     >> justification?
     >>
     >> At this point it looks as if clients just need to increment their
     >> upper bound.
     >>
     >> Cheers
     >> /Eike
     >>
     >> ----
     >> _http://www.esc-net.de_ <http://www.esc-net.de/>
     >> _http://thegordian.blogspot.com_ <http://thegordian.blogspot.com/>
     >> _http://twitter.com/eikestepper_
     >>
     >>
     >>
     >> Am 11.03.2017 um 03:24 schrieb Evgeny Mandrikov:
     >>> Hello,
     >>>
     >>> I'm forwarding the following thread of discussion since seems
     that
     >>> previous messages were not delivered to the list - "being
     held until
     >>> the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is
     >>> being held: Too many recipients to the message"
     >>>
     >>> And an update on subject:
     >>> EclEmma has been re-enabled to unblock work of Andreas Sewe on
     >>> _https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/84521/_
     <https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/84521/>
     >>> Papyrus really seems to be a cause of a problem, because after
     >>> re-enablement all builds are still green.
     >>>
     >>> Regards,
     >>> Evgeny
     >>>
     >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
     >>> From: Evgeny Mandrikov <_mandrikov@gmail.com_
     <mailto:mandrikov@xxxxxxxxx>
     >>> <_mailto:mandrikov@gmail.com_>>
     >>> Date: Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 1:46 PM
     >>> Subject: Re: Problems with Simrel contribution
     >>> To: Grégoire DUPE <_gdupe@mia-software.com_
     <mailto:gdupe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
     >>> <_mailto:gdupe@mia-software.com_>>, Sravan K Lakkimsetti
     >>> <_sravankumarl@xxxxxx.com_
     <mailto:sravankumarl@xxxxxxxxxx><_mailto:sravankumarl@xxxxxx.com_
     <mailto:sravankumarl@xxxxxxxxxx>>>,
     >>> _jfaltermeier@eclipsesource.com_
     <mailto:jfaltermeier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
     >>> <_mailto:jfaltermeier@eclipsesource.com_
     <mailto:jfaltermeier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
     >>> <_jfaltermeier@eclipsesource.com_
     <mailto:jfaltermeier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
     >>> <_mailto:jfaltermeier@eclipsesource.com_
     <mailto:jfaltermeier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>,
     _emueller@eclipsesource.com_ <mailto:emueller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
     >>> <_mailto:emueller@eclipsesource.com_
     <mailto:emueller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
     <_emueller@eclipsesource.com_ <mailto:emueller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
     >>> <_mailto:emueller@eclipsesource.com_
     <mailto:emueller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>, _stepper@esc-net.de_
     <mailto:stepper@xxxxxxxxxx>
     >>> <_mailto:stepper@esc-net.de_> <_stepper@esc-net.de_
     <mailto:stepper@xxxxxxxxxx>
     >>> <_mailto:stepper@esc-net.de_>>, _cedric.brun@obeo.fr_
     <mailto:cedric.brun@xxxxxxx>
     >>> <_mailto:cedric.brun@obeo.fr_> <_cedric.brun@obeo.fr_
     <mailto:cedric.brun@xxxxxxx>
     >>> <_mailto:cedric.brun@obeo.fr_>>, _laurent.goubet@obeo.fr_
     <mailto:laurent.goubet@xxxxxxx>
     >>> <_mailto:laurent.goubet@obeo.fr_> <_laurent.goubet@obeo.fr_
     <mailto:laurent.goubet@xxxxxxx>
     >>> <_mailto:laurent.goubet@obeo.fr_>>,
     _lorenzo.bettini@gmail.com_ <mailto:lorenzo.bettini@xxxxxxxxx>
     >>> <_mailto:lorenzo.bettini@gmail.com_
     <mailto:lorenzo.bettini@xxxxxxxxx>> <_lorenzo.bettini@gmail.com_
     <mailto:lorenzo.bettini@xxxxxxxxx>
     >>> <_mailto:lorenzo.bettini@gmail.com_
     <mailto:lorenzo.bettini@xxxxxxxxx>>>,
     _vincenzo.caselli@rcp-vision.com_
     <mailto:vincenzo.caselli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
     >>> <_mailto:vincenzo.caselli@rcp-vision.com_
     <mailto:vincenzo.caselli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
     >>> <_vincenzo.caselli@rcp-vision.com_
     <mailto:vincenzo.caselli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
     >>> <_mailto:vincenzo.caselli@rcp-vision.com_
     <mailto:vincenzo.caselli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>,
     >>> _francesco.guidieri@gmail.com_
     <mailto:francesco.guidieri@xxxxxxxxx><_mailto:francesco.guidieri@gmail.com_
     <mailto:francesco.guidieri@xxxxxxxxx>>
     >>> <_francesco.guidieri@gmail.com_
     <mailto:francesco.guidieri@xxxxxxxxx>
     >>> <_mailto:francesco.guidieri@gmail.com_
     <mailto:francesco.guidieri@xxxxxxxxx>>>,
     _francois.le-fevre@cea.fr_ <mailto:francois.le-fevre@xxxxxx>
     >>> <_mailto:francois.le-fevre@cea.fr_
     <mailto:francois.le-fevre@xxxxxx>> <_francois.le-fevre@cea.fr_
     <mailto:francois.le-fevre@xxxxxx>
     >>> <_mailto:francois.le-fevre@cea.fr_
     <mailto:francois.le-fevre@xxxxxx>>>, _quentin.lemenez@cea.fr_
     <mailto:quentin.lemenez@xxxxxx>
     >>> <_mailto:quentin.lemenez@cea.fr_> <_quentin.lemenez@cea.fr_
     <mailto:quentin.lemenez@xxxxxx>
     >>> <_mailto:quentin.lemenez@cea.fr_>>, _vincent.lorenzo@cea.fr_
     <mailto:vincent.lorenzo@xxxxxx>
     >>> <_mailto:vincent.lorenzo@cea.fr_> <_vincent.lorenzo@cea.fr_
     <mailto:vincent.lorenzo@xxxxxx>
     >>> <_mailto:vincent.lorenzo@cea.fr_>>,
     _stephaneberle9@gmail.com_ <mailto:stephaneberle9@xxxxxxxxx>
     >>> <_mailto:stephaneberle9@gmail.com_
     <mailto:stephaneberle9@xxxxxxxxx>> <_stephaneberle9@gmail.com_
     <mailto:stephaneberle9@xxxxxxxxx>
     >>> <_mailto:stephaneberle9@gmail.com_
     <mailto:stephaneberle9@xxxxxxxxx>>>, Frederic Gurr
     >>> <_frederic.gurr@eclipse.org_
     <mailto:frederic.gurr@xxxxxxxxxxx><_mailto:frederic.gurr@eclipse.org_
     <mailto:frederic.gurr@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>
     >>> Cc: Cross project issues
     <_cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org_
     <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
     >>> <_mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org_
     <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>
     >>>
     >>>
     >>> Hi,
     >>>
     >>> FWIW I come to exactly the same conclusion.
     >>> And so tried to confirm by re-enabling EclEmma -
     >>> _https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/92766/_
     <https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/92766/>, validation build
     successful -
     >>>
     _https://hudson.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.oxygen.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/391/console_
     <https://hudson.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.oxygen.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/391/console>
     >>>
     >>> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 1:24 PM Grégoire DUPE
     >>> <_gdupe@mia-software.com_
     <mailto:gdupe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><_mailto:gdupe@mia-software.com_
     <mailto:gdupe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
     >>>
     >>>     Hello,
     >>>
     >>>     It’s looks like that the problem comes from
     >>> ‘org.eclipse.papyrus.infra.widgets’ which has the following
     dependency
     >>>     : org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench [1.2.0,2.0.0) (cf.
     the error
     >>> message at the end of this e-mail)
     >>>
     >>>     Can anybody from Papyrus check that ?
     >>>
     >>>     Regards,
     >>>
     >>>     Grégoire
     >>>
     >>>     Cannot complete the install because of a conflicting
     dependency.
     >>>
     >>>     Software being installed: validationSet_main 1.0.0
     >>>
     >>>     Only one of the following can be installed at once:
     >>> [org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench 2.0.0.v20170228-1842,
     >>>     org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench 1.3.0.v20170105-1239]
     >>>
     >>>     Cannot satisfy dependency:
     >>>
     mappedRepo_download.eclipse.org_eclipse_updates_4.7milestones_S-4.7M6-201703082000
     >>>     1.0.0 depends on: org.eclipse.platform.ide 0.0.0
     >>>
     >>>     Cannot satisfy dependency:
     >>>
     mappedRepo_download.eclipse.org_modeling_mdt_papyrus_updates_milestones_3.0_M5_main
     >>>     1.0.0 depends on:
     org.eclipse.papyrus.sdk.feature.feature.group
     >>> 3.0.0
     >>>
     >>>     Cannot satisfy dependency:
     >>> org.eclipse.papyrus.infra.widget.feature.feature.group
     >>> 3.0.0.201702011724 depends on:
     >>>     org.eclipse.papyrus.infra.widgets [3.0.0.201702011724]
     >>>
     >>>     Cannot satisfy dependency: org.eclipse.papyrus.infra.widgets
     >>> 3.0.0.201702011724 depends on: bundle
     >>>     org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench [1.2.0,2.0.0)
     >>>
     >>>     Cannot satisfy dependency:
     >>> org.eclipse.papyrus.sdk.feature.feature.group 3.0.0.201702011724
     >>> depends on:
     >>>     org.eclipse.papyrus.infra.widget.feature.feature.group
     >>> [3.0.0.201702011724]
     >>>
     >>>     Cannot satisfy dependency:
     org.eclipse.platform.feature.group
     >>> 4.7.0.v20170308-2000 depends on: org.eclipse.ui.ide
     >>>     [3.13.0.v20170306-1626]
     >>>
     >>>     Cannot satisfy dependency: org.eclipse.platform.ide
     >>> 4.7.0.I20170308-2000 depends on:
     >>>     org.eclipse.platform.feature.group [4.7.0.v20170308-2000]
     >>>
     >>>     Cannot satisfy dependency: org.eclipse.ui.ide
     >>> 3.13.0.v20170306-1626 depends on: bundle
     >>>     org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench [2.0.0,3.0.0)
     >>>
     >>>     Cannot satisfy dependency: validationSet_main 1.0.0
     depends on:
     >>>
     mappedRepo_download.eclipse.org_eclipse_updates_4.7milestones_S-4.7M6-201703082000
     >>> [1.0.0]
     >>>
     >>>     Cannot satisfy dependency: validationSet_main 1.0.0
     depends on:
     >>>
     mappedRepo_download.eclipse.org_modeling_mdt_papyrus_updates_milestones_3.0_M5_main
     >>> [1.0.0]
     >>>
     >>>     Only one of the following can be installed at once:
     >>>
     >>>       Eclipse Workbench Model 2.0.0.v20170228-1842
     >>> (org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench 2.0.0.v20170228-1842)
     >>>
     >>>       Eclipse Workbench Model 1.3.0.v20170105-1239
     >>> (org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench 1.3.0.v20170105-1239)
     >>>
     >>>     bundle(org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench
     2.0.0.v20170228-1842)
     >>> is required by:
     >>>
     >>>     ValidationSet(main)
     >>>
     >>>     Contribution(Eclipse)
     >>>
     >>>
     MappedRepository(_http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/updates/4.7milestones/S-4.7M6-201703082000/_
     <http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/updates/4.7milestones/S-4.7M6-201703082000/>)

     >>>
     >>>
     >>>     Product(org.eclipse.platform.ide)
     >>>
     >>>     InstallableUnit(org.eclipse.platform.feature.group
     >>> 4.7.0.v20170308-2000)
     >>>
     >>>     InstallableUnit(org.eclipse.ui.ide 3.13.0.v20170306-1626)
     >>>
     >>>     bundle(org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench
     1.3.0.v20170105-1239)
     >>> is required by:
     >>>
     >>>     ValidationSet(main)
     >>>
     >>>     Contribution(Papyrus)
     >>>
     >>>
     MappedRepository(_http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/mdt/papyrus/updates/milestones/3.0/M5/main_
     <http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/mdt/papyrus/updates/milestones/3.0/M5/main>)

     >>>
     >>>
     >>>     Feature(org.eclipse.papyrus.sdk.feature.feature.group 3.0.0)
     >>>
     >>>
     InstallableUnit(org.eclipse.papyrus.infra.widget.feature.feature.group

     >>> 3.0.0.201702011724)
     >>>
     >>>     InstallableUnit(org.eclipse.papyrus.infra.widgets
     >>> 3.0.0.201702011724)
     >>>
     >>>     *De :* Sravan K Lakkimsetti
     [_mailto:sravankumarl@xxxxxx.com_ <mailto:sravankumarl@xxxxxxxxxx>
     >>> <_mailto:sravankumarl@xxxxxx.com_
     <mailto:sravankumarl@xxxxxxxxxx>>]
     >>>     *Envoyé :* vendredi 10 mars 2017 11:33
     >>>     *À :* _mandrikov@gmail.com_
     <mailto:mandrikov@xxxxxxxxx><_mailto:mandrikov@gmail.com_
     <mailto:mandrikov@xxxxxxxxx>>;
     >>> _jfaltermeier@eclipsesource.com_
     <mailto:jfaltermeier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
     >>>     <_mailto:jfaltermeier@eclipsesource.com_
     <mailto:jfaltermeier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>;
     >>> _emueller@eclipsesource.com_
     <mailto:emueller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><_mailto:emueller@eclipsesource.com_
     <mailto:emueller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>;
     >>>     _stepper@esc-net.de_
     <mailto:stepper@xxxxxxxxxx><_mailto:stepper@esc-net.de_
     <mailto:stepper@xxxxxxxxxx>>;
     >>> _cedric.brun@obeo.fr_
     <mailto:cedric.brun@xxxxxxx><_mailto:cedric.brun@obeo.fr_
     <mailto:cedric.brun@xxxxxxx>>;
     >>>     _laurent.goubet@obeo.fr_
     <mailto:laurent.goubet@xxxxxxx><_mailto:laurent.goubet@obeo.fr_
     <mailto:laurent.goubet@xxxxxxx>>;
     >>> _lorenzo.bettini@gmail.com_ <mailto:lorenzo.bettini@xxxxxxxxx>
     >>>     <_mailto:lorenzo.bettini@gmail.com_
     <mailto:lorenzo.bettini@xxxxxxxxx>>;
     >>> _vincenzo.caselli@rcp-vision.com_
     <mailto:vincenzo.caselli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
     >>> <_mailto:vincenzo.caselli@rcp-vision.com_
     <mailto:vincenzo.caselli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>;
     >>>     _francesco.guidieri@gmail.com_
     <mailto:francesco.guidieri@xxxxxxxxx>
     >>> <_mailto:francesco.guidieri@gmail.com_
     <mailto:francesco.guidieri@xxxxxxxxx>>; Grégoire DUPE
     >>> <_gdupe@mia-software.com_ <mailto:gdupe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
     >>>     <_mailto:gdupe@mia-software.com_>>;
     _francois.le-fevre@cea.fr_ <mailto:francois.le-fevre@xxxxxx>
     >>> <_mailto:francois.le-fevre@cea.fr_
     <mailto:francois.le-fevre@xxxxxx>>;
     >>>     _quentin.lemenez@cea.fr_
     <mailto:quentin.lemenez@xxxxxx><_mailto:quentin.lemenez@cea.fr_
     <mailto:quentin.lemenez@xxxxxx>>;
     >>> _vincent.lorenzo@cea.fr_
     <mailto:vincent.lorenzo@xxxxxx><_mailto:vincent.lorenzo@cea.fr_
     <mailto:vincent.lorenzo@xxxxxx>>;
     >>>     _stephaneberle9@gmail.com_
     <mailto:stephaneberle9@xxxxxxxxx><_mailto:stephaneberle9@gmail.com_
     <mailto:stephaneberle9@xxxxxxxxx>>;
     >>> Frederic Gurr <_frederic.gurr@eclipse.org_
     <mailto:frederic.gurr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
     >>>     <_mailto:frederic.gurr@eclipse.org_
     <mailto:frederic.gurr@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>
     >>>     *Objet :* Problems with Simrel contribution
     >>>
     >>>     Hi,
     >>>
     >>>     I am doing simrel contribution for 4.7 M6 for platform and
     >>> equinox. During this process. I found that the
     >>>     following projects are not compatible anymore. I have
     disabled
     >>> these projects with my contribution. My request is
     >>>     to re-enable them during your contribution to 4.7 M6.
     >>>
     >>>     The projects that were disabled.
     >>>
     >>>      1. EclEmma
     >>>      2. ECP
     >>>      3. EMF CDO
     >>>      4. EMF COMPARE
     >>>      5. EMF Parsley
     >>>      6. MoDisco
     >>>      7. Papyrus
     >>>      8. Sphinx
     >>>
     >>>     Thanks and Regards,
     >>>
     >>>     Sravan
     >>>
     >>>     Sravan Kumar Lakkimsetti
     >>>
     >>>     IBM India Pvt Ltd,
     >>>
     >>>     Embassy Golf Links Business Park, D Block,
     >>>
     >>>     Off Indiranagar-Kormangla Inner Ring Road,
     >>>
     >>>     Bangalore - 560071, India
     >>>
     >>>     Phone: 91-80-41776858
     >>>
     >>>
     >>>
     >>> _______________________________________________
     >>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
     >>> _cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org_
     <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
     >>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
     >>> unsubscribe from this list, visit
     >>>
     _https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev_
     <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev>
     >>
     >>
     >> _______________________________________________
     >> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
     >> _cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org_
     <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
     >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
     >> unsubscribe from this list, visit
     >>
     _https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev_
     <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev>
     >>
     >
     >
     > ---
     > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
     software.
     > _https://www.avast.com/antivirus_ <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
     >
     > _______________________________________________
     > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
     > _cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org_
     <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
     > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
     > unsubscribe from this list, visit
     >
     _https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev_
     <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev>
     >


     ---
     This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software._
     __https://www.avast.com/antivirus_ <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

     _______________________________________________
     cross-project-issues-dev mailing list_
     __cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org_
     <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
     To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
     unsubscribe from this list, visit_
     __https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev_
     <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev>




     _______________________________________________
     cross-project-issues-dev mailing list_
     __cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org_
     <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
     To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
     unsubscribe from this list, visit_
     __https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev_
     <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev>_______________________________________________
     cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
     cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
     <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
     To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
     unsubscribe from this list, visit
     https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
     <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev>




     _______________________________________________
     cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
     cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
     <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
     To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
     https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
     <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev>



     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Avast logo <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> 	

     This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
     www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>



     _______________________________________________
     cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
     cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
     <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
     To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
     unsubscribe from this list, visit
     https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
     <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev>




--
--
Trainer, Consultant and Developer

vogella GmbH
Haindaalwisch 17a, 22395 Hamburg
Amtsgericht Hamburg: HRB 127058
Geschäftsführer: Lars Vogel, Jennifer Nerlich de Vogel
USt-IdNr.: DE284122352
Tel (040) 78804360, Fax (032) 221739404, Email:
simon.scholz@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:simon.scholz@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Web:
http://www.vogella.com <http://www.vogella.com/>
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev



_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev






---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Back to the top