[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[cross-project-issues-dev] Neon participation dates

Greetings all. For those project teams who are participating in Neon, here are some important dates.

Dec 18/2015 - Opt-in deadline
Feb 12/2016 - (Tentative) CQ Submission deadline (specify that the CQ is required for Neon)
May 26/2016 - (Tentative) IP Log submission deadline
June 2/2016 - Review materials due
June 9/2016 - End of Release Review Period

Note that I have confidence in the two IP-related dates, but have not yet received confirmation from the IP Team (so these dates may change).

Also note that the opt-in deadline is approaching. AFAICT, the following projects have not yet stated their intent to participate.
  • Ecore Tools
  • WindowBuilder
  • Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN2)
  • Eclipse Gyrex Project
  • ATL - A Model Transformation Technology
  • BPEL Designer
  • BPMN2 Modeler Project
  • Graphical Modeling Framework (GMF) Runtime
  • Graphical Modeling Framework (GMF) Notation
  • EMF Query
  • EMF Transaction
  • EMF Validation
  • EMF Diff/Merge
  • Eclipse Web Tools Platform Project
  • Mylyn
  • Amalgamation
  • Graphical Modeling Framework (GMF) Tooling
  • Eclipse Packaging Project
  • Marketplace Client
  • Target Management
The process that we have established currently is that project teams must announce their intent to participate on this list. Please provide a link to the release record in the PMI and the participation offset.

I did actually search the mailing list archives for many of these, but got depressed and stopped looking after about a short while. If you've already announced and I missed it, please accept my apologies and restate your intent on this list.

The live list of participating projects is here:

https://projects.eclipse.org/releases/neon

If your project is listed without a version, please ensure that a release record has been created and let me know. If you're not sure about the version number, please make a good guess with the understanding that you can just change the name/number in the record later and everything will work out (references in the database are by record, not by any particular value).

FWIW, the reason why we made this explicit opt-in a few years ago was to ensure that everybody was paying attention. Please prove that you're paying attention. Feel free to chastise me if you feel that I've not been paying sufficient attention (e.g. I missed your statement of intent to participate) :-)

If you have any questions, please ask.

Thanks,

Wayne

--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation
EclipseCon
          NA 2016

JPEG image