Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Provider and feature names


> Am 17.11.2014 um 22:26 schrieb Tom Schindl <tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> I disagree with you on that. I think it has value that the project name
> is in the feature name and the reason it simple: Better grouping on the
> p2-Update-UI!

Those points seems valid … but isn’t it insane how we constrain ourselves to drive a decision because of some broken UI? I actually prefer more descriptive feature names and stopped repeating the project name in features.


Gunnar Wagenknecht

Back to the top