| [cross-project-issues-dev] Simrel Greediness Report (was: Yet another nag note) |
|
Hi David, Given that I also found “219. org.eclipse.rse.services.ssh” in your greediness report, I was confused (since that bundle doesn’t declare anything optional in
its Manifest). Could it be that the report blames the wrong bundle? http://build.eclipse.org/juno/simrel/reporeports/reports/greedyReport.html I just performed an “unzip –p …/releases/staging/content.jar | less” and I see that my 2 bundles are
“required optional with defaults” by
org.eclipse.dltk.rse.core so I believe that bundle is to blame in this case… I am likely responsible for fixing the “7. Gnu.io” one which should definitely be non-greedy especially given that we don’t ship it from Eclipse (it’s a “works-with” pre-req). Investigating now… Martin From: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Dennis Hübner Hi David,
Sure there are greedy optional dependencies in the repository, because it often just intended by projects. I don't understand, why are you talking about
incorrect greediness? "Not a default" it not the same as "wrong". IMHO this [1] report is only useful for statistic purpose. Regards, Dennis Hübner Xtext Commiter / Build Engineer
Am 24.05.2012 um 06:40 schrieb David M Williams: |