Greetings folks. The IP Log submission deadline for Juno is today.|
If your project has CQs that still need to be processed, please hold
off submitting until the CQs have been approved.
There are some resources to help you sort out your logs.
The Downloads Report  compares the contents of your project's
download directory with the CQ record. It lists JAR files that we
cannot map to a CQ in red; if you click the entry, it will show you
where the file was found. The tool does its work based on the file
name, and so it does--at least for some projects--mis-identify some
JARs. It currently does a pretty bad job on JAR files embedded
inside bundles, for example (like Ant). If the bundle JAR follows
standard naming conventions, however, it should be able to identify
a CQ. If its not properly mapping, let me know and I'll help you
sort out the problem (very often, it's a matter of a missing
Note that the Downloads Report shows the results of a batch process.
Changes are not immediately reflected. I can re-run the batch script
The Contribution Report  scans Bugzilla for potential
contributions that should be included in an IP Log. Near the top of
the page is a list of recommendations that may help you sort out
things that perhaps should be flagged iplog+ to be included in the
log. The tool doesn't know what's actually been committed, so human
intervention is required.
Note that the IP Log generator determines contributions using both
the information from Bugzilla and from Git repositories. If your
project uses Git, the repositories captured in your project metadata
are mined for records with authors that are not committers. The tool
is not currently smart enough to recognize duplication between
Bugzilla and Git. This normally isn't an issue for projects that
have switched to Git: pre-Git contributions are recorded by
Bugzilla, and post-Git contributions are recorded by Git. FWIW, a
little redundant information in the IP Log is not generally a big
deal; missing information, however, is a big deal. There's more
information about how Git contributions are handled in the wiki .
I have been tracking the Juno releases under the "Community /
Proposals and Reviews" as blockers on Bug 379560 . I will update
the Projects landing page  as I receive PMC-approved review
Let me know if you have any questions or require assistance.
The Eclipse Foundation