Hi William,
It's working now on my end as well. Perhaps I just hit it as it was being updated or something.
cheers,
Miles
On 2012-05-10, at 12:41 AM, William Piers wrote:
Hi Miles,
I checked the ATL update site and all seems ok to me, both http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/m2m/atl/updates/milestones/3.3/
and http://download.eclipse.org/releases/staging/
shows ATL M7 build and its installation works.
William
Le 10/05/2012 02:56, Miles Parker a écrit :
Hi,
FWIW, I couldn't get the M2M ATL entry ( http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/m2m/atl/updates/milestones/3.3/)
and it broke, reporting missing repos. Reverting wpiers' change
so that it uses 3.2 instead works, but I'm sure that's not
what's intended. Don't know what's going on here or if this is
showing up in actual build but I thought I'd mention it.
(And yes, my ssh does work, thanks Denis. Now I'm waiting on
build to complete and may need further tweaks. David, please do
not wait on me, but I'll re-enable and commit IIF I can get a
clean local validation here.)
-Miles
On 2012-05-09, at 9:18 AM, Borislav Kapukaranov wrote:
Hey David,
I just successfully validated the virgo.b3aggrcon and
enabled it. We don't have new content for this milestone but
I updated the references to Equinox.
Best Regards
Bobby
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Doug
Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
CDT is scrambling to fix some major issues. We may
ask for more time. Hopefully not.
Thanks,
Doug
Reminder ... it is
+3 day! 5 PM this evening (Eastern) will
be "cut-off" unless someone asks for a few
extra hours.
I removed the emf
compare feature from modeling category,
since it was cause build to fail. If there
is some other one that's supposed to be
there, please add it back.
The following still
have disabled repositories or features:
amp.b3aggrcon
equinox.b3aggrcon
jetty.b3aggrcon
mft.b3aggrcon
riena.b3aggrcon
virgo.b3aggrcon
Any word?
I can speak to the
equinox one. See bug 378735[1]. It is
related to the
org.eclipse.rcp.sdk.id "product".
I _think_ I can add it back for
RC1. But is anyone using it? Can anyone
document a use case? It has not been
working/available for all of Juno, so far,
and no one has really complained, and no
one seems to have a clear id of if or why
its needed.
So, I know it'd be
short notice to remove it ... but ...
would also appreciate someone clearly
saying why its needed.
[1]
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=378735
<graycol.gif>David M
Williams---05/09/2012 10:45:14 AM---Thanks
for replying. But, I'm a little confused,
as the be current aggregation builds are
failing ou
From: David M
Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
To: laurent.goubet@xxxxxxx,
Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date: 05/09/2012
10:45 AM
Subject: Re:
[cross-project-issues-dev] Status and
outlook for M7
Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks for replying.
But, I'm a little confused, as the be
current aggregation builds are failing
out-of-the-gate saying there is a problem
with the model, at the emf.compare in the
"modeling category" does not refer to the
right one. And, apparently comes from
several sources? (at least in past?) so ...
is there supposed to be _any_ emf.compare in
Juno? Or is it completely gone? If the
later, I'll just remove it from the
category. If the the former ... I'll have to
hunt around for which is "the right one" and
use it (so, hoping someone knows off the top
of their head).
FYI, this can be seen by using the b3
aggregator editor, selecting the top level
"aggregation" note, and then running the
"validate" command from context menu. (Not
even "validate aggregation", just "validate"
which just validates the XML and EMF model).
Thanks,
Laurent
Goubet ---05/09/2012 09:02:33 AM---Hi, Sorry
about the delay before replying, May has a
lot of holidays here :).
From: Laurent Goubet <laurent.goubet@xxxxxxx>
To: Cross
project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date: 05/09/2012 09:02 AM
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev]
Status and outlook for M7
Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
Sorry about the delay before replying, May
has a lot of holidays here :).
emf-compare.b3aggrcon indeed had one
repository "disabled"... that was only a
leftover from a previous milestone and did
not impact M7. We've removed that repository
from the file.
Laurent Goubet
Obeo
On 06/05/2012 21:38, David M Williams wrote:
Yes ... its here, M7 week! And, I'm
already giving status!
First thing to note it that we now have a
stand-alone 4.2 primary build from the
Eclipse Project, so for the first time we
have a pure and correct 4.2 repo. In the
past, some things from 3.8 were "slipping
in" through aggregation due to the way the
platform was producing and partially
(unknowingly) combining 3.8 and 4.2. But
no more, 4.2 only.
One impact of this, is the bundle
'org.eclipse.help.appserver' is no longer
available ... it was actually removed in
4.1, but it is being left in the 3.x
stream, even though 3.8 does not use it.
It now correctly does _not_ show up in 4.2
repo via aggregation.
And, this "broke" BIRT ... so, I disabled
that, which rippled across 3 or 4 others
that depend on BIRT charting.
I hope BIRT can live without that old
bundle and use the jetty server now
provided by the platform (and used by the
help system, in both 3.8 and 4.2).
http://git.eclipse.org/c/platform/eclipse.platform.common.git/plain/bundles/org.eclipse.platform.doc.isv/porting/4.2/incompatibilities.html?h=R4_HEAD#help-appserver
Then there were the (fairly) usual
breakages in RAP runtime and Virgo based
on assumptions on certain platform
specific versions, so I disabled those to
get a green build, and promote an initial
M7 version to staging. Be sure to check
the reports (based on staging) to get as
much cleaned up as possible before M7:
http://build.eclipse.org/juno/simrel/reporeports/
In all, the following files have disabled
repositories or features. It looks worse
than it is, but we need to get in
completely "enabled" in the next few days
(or, remove it, if its some old thing that
should not even be there any longer).
amp.b3aggrcon
birt.b3aggrcon
emf-compare.b3aggrcon
equinox.b3aggrcon
jetty.b3aggrcon
linuxtools.b3aggrcon
mat.b3aggrcon
mdt-papyrus.b3aggrcon
mft.b3aggrcon
rap.b3aggrcon
riena.b3aggrcon
scout.b3aggrcon
virgo.b3aggrcon
As always questions and clarifications are
welcome.
Thanks everyone,
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
[attachment
"laurent_goubet.vcf" deleted by David M
Williams/Raleigh/IBM]
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
______________________________
Miles T. Parker
Senior Engineer and Product
Manager, Tasktop
Committer, Eclipse
Mylyn and Virgo
Project Lead, Model
Focussing Tools and AMP
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
<william_piers.vcf>_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
______________________________ Miles T. Parker Senior Engineer and Product Manager, Tasktop Committer, Eclipse Mylyn and Virgo Project Lead, Model Focussing Tools and AMP
|