[cross-project-issues-dev] AMP is good for RC1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[cross-project-issues-dev] AMP is good for RC1

From: Miles Parker <milesparker@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 14:02:37 -0700
Delivered-to: cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version:x-mailer; b=tpJOyU5CyFQMQ7MmyJkx1dHae7KUePzjzYFRJK3asHyIUsdyfFAVxM7eMiP63HwsDh +RqVQ1yZROLgTZhyAp/MW4sw5dSVGX929eJDETq+Dej2ps8225ofrebS2hx5vUTaDw0d gkfEtasKX0FwemoZAmszC2K3UgCL/iMwlpXUM=
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/cross-project-issues-dev>
List-help: <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev>, <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/cross-project-issues-dev>, <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Since we're on the tail end of things I thought I should note that we're through. At least B3 verifies on this end. BTW, for really frustrating reasons (https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=346140) the license files just don't seem to want to be updated. I'm suspecting something is amiss with my git repos as I've been trying to make these updates since before M7. :( C'est la guerre..

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] AMP is good for RC1 ... and +3 day status
  - From: David M Williams

Prev by Date: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Buckminster/Git Re: CDO RC1 contribution delayed to +3
Next by Date: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] AMP is good for RC1 ... and +3 day status
Previous by thread: [cross-project-issues-dev] Question about signing and pack200
Next by thread: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] AMP is good for RC1 ... and +3 day status
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs