Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [Maven/Tycho] Suggested groupId

On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 06:49:13 pm Jesse McConnell wrote:
> normal people use org.eclipse.<project> as the groupId and an
> artifactId of something like jetty-server
> anything other then that is not following normal maven conventions...

sounds good to me, but ...

> that being said there has been discussion about using that
> org.eclipse:org.eclipse.jetty.jetty-server:<version> notation to allow
> for reverse mappings to bundles...

The last part seems to refer to statements like Jason's in
  "org.eclipse.<project> Would definitely not be better. We've already discussed
  this at length and having a 1:1 mapping of artifactId to symbolic bundle name
  is the only way we can deterministically map between the two systems. Take a
  non-constant groupId and you can't correctly determine the symbolic bundle

Is anybody inclined to resolve this conflict, or will every project just do as it pleases?


Back to the top