JWT isn't a modeling project.
I'm a little concerned to see folks like Christian Damus and Richard
Gronback as contact points for the projects given they are no longer
committers. I'm also concerned at the state of CVS with the recent
changes to OCL. It appears that a large portion of the modeling
technology stack simply can't build right now, with GMF, QVT, Query,
and Validation all appearing to be broken to me. Some of the folks on
the CC list really need to take immediate steps to address the
outstanding issues or we're headed for a train wreck.
David M Williams wrote:
As mentioned on another thread, I've
updated the starter "participating projects" page,
with a little more top level
and added the following guidance at the
top of the page:
[Note: the data that's currently there was just a
edit of last years data to provide a starting point. As projects fill
the table, be sure to discuss with your PMC and Project Chain and
Peers. It is desired to consolidate as many "rows" as can meaningfully
and legitimately be combined. In the end, each row should correspond to
one project review (that is, one set of Docuware for each row).]
Looks like we have 11 Top Level
now! Guess I forgot about that "Runtime" one. :) And, appears
to me there would be at least 25 "rows", at a minimum.
If anyone sees any improvements to
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.