Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] RC5 ... are we done yet?

[Martin Taal <mtaal@xxxxxxxxx>]

And EMF Teneo also has an issue which we discovered yesterday which 
impacts the modeling EPP.... I can do a new build today, hopefully in a 
few hours or less.

gr. Martin

Michael Spector wrote:
> We have build problems with PDT, so RC5 is not ready yet.
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 7:39 AM, David M Williams 
> <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>     Yes, we are. Well, for staging site.
>     Activity is quiet and no one has mentioned being delayed, so
>     assuming we
>     are done.
>     And, just sort of done for sort of a short period of time.
>
>     If someone really does have a true stop-ship bug, you can post re-spin
>     request here for consideration to see if everyone else agrees to
>     re-spin.
>     (remember, it would have to be more than just a bad bug ... but
>     something
>     damaging to users or infrastructure).
>
>     Now what?
>
>     I know as we enter final daze
>     http://wiki.eclipse.org/Galileo/Final_Daze
>     (hint, read the document!)
>     many people will eventually (over next week or two, depending on your
>     releng processes) want to update your .build file to point to your
>     "permanent" update site, instead of "milestones" or "interim",
>     etc. That's
>     fine, I'll leave builds "on" but these builds will not be pushed to
>     'staging' (staging is done).
>
>     That's fine, on one condition ... that you still make sure your .build
>     file is correct and really "builds" ok. That's why we leave the
>     builder
>     active. We need to keep in a state of being able to re-build, in
>     case it
>     is needed for some reason. That's just good releng hygiene. It is
>     harder,
>     with Simultaneous Release, since the build "data" comes from two
>     sources,
>     the .build files (which we could tag, have control over, etc.) but
>     also
>     your own update sites, which totally depends on you and requires
>     you to
>     keep "constant" so we can always re-build, if we had to. And, don't
>     forget, vice-versa ... if/when you change your "milestones"
>     directory to
>     "updates" (or similar) be sure you update your .build file so it
>     will be
>     accurate and continue to build.
>
>     So, what next, after that?
>
>     In about a month (or so) we'll start some maintenance efforts for
>     Galileo
>     SR1. At that point you'll update your .build files again (if you have
>     maintenance) and provide an interim maintenance update site to
>     pull from.
>     But please do not modify your .build files for maintenance until
>     instructed ... just to make sure we are all ready and know what's
>     going
>     on.
>
>     As always, if questions, issues, or you need something special,
>     just ask
>     (here on cross-project list).
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>     cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>     https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>   

--

With Regards, Martin Taal

Springsite/Elver.org
Office: Hardwareweg 4, 3821 BV Amersfoort
Postal: Nassaulaan 7, 3941 EC Doorn
The Netherlands
Cell: +31 (0)6 288 48 943
Tel: +31 (0)84 420 2397
Fax: +31 (0)84 225 9307
Mail: mtaal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx - mtaal@xxxxxxxxx
Web: www.springsite.com - www.elver.org