Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Question about theBranding requirement fo

[Thomas Hallgren <thomas@xxxxxxx>]

Ed Merks wrote:

Thomas,

Are you seriously suggesting that we come up with a better name than EMF?  We've been using for the last seven years...

Not really. I agree that EMF is a strong brand today :-)

What I'm serious about is that if project branding is important to Galileo and coming release trains, and if we really care about how things look when listed together and want to convey an impression that it all stems from the same family, then the frequent use of abbreviations is starting to become problematic. The problem gets worse over time since many new proposed projects continue in that vein.

- thomas