| RE: [cross-project-issues-dev] Ganymede M5: multipledifferentversions of Orbit bundles? |
The EPP Modeling package contains the feature versions from the Ganymede staging update site, and all Batik bundles in that package are provided by org.eclipse.gmf.runtime.thirdparty_1.0.0.v20080107-0000-7J8P4EEt6YaUquZ_mp-f. So, yes, it is possible to re-run EPP, and yes, in theory it would be possible to consume the bits from your project update site, but I think it would be better to update the .sc files and to integrate these new versions in Ganymede. Markus -----Original Message----- From: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Richard Gronback Sent: Fri 22/02/2008 12:17 To: Cross project issues Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Ganymede M5: multipledifferentversions of Orbit bundles? I believe it is a problem with the EPP package, as it doesn¹t yet include GMF¹s M5 build. We changed the batik version we use to match TPTP and BIRT recently. If the Modeling package can be rebuilt using the latest project bits, it should fix this issue. - Rich On 2/22/08 4:36 AM, "Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think these are the culprits - BIRT and TPTP correctly use v200802090005, > but these do not: > > unzip digest.zip > egrep '<feature|transcoder' digest.xml | grep -B 1 '<plugin.*transcoder' > > <feature label="Third-Party Components for GMF Runtime " > provider-name="Eclipse.org" id="org.eclipse.gmf.runtime.thirdparty" > version="1.0.0.v20080107-0000-7J8P4EEt6YaUquZ_mp-f" > > <plugin id="org.apache.batik.transcoder" version="1.6.0.v200711021015" > unpack="false" /> > -- > <feature label="Third-Party Components for GMF Runtime Developer Resources " > provider-name="Eclipse.org" id="org.eclipse.gmf.runtime.thirdparty.source" > version="1.0.0.v20070608-1200-7D85-EB7sQRxeeQseQfV" > > <plugin id="org.apache.batik.transcoder.source" > version="1.6.0.v200711021015" /> > > Can this be a problem for the EPP Packages? - Looks like the Modeling package > would be the only one including the old stuff, would that also include the > newer batik? And what would happen if somebody downloaded Modeling EPP Package > but then used Ganymede site to upgrade or add more stuff? > > I also found this, not sure if it's an issue: > > <feature label="Batik PDF" provider-name="Eclipse.org" > id="org.eclipse.tptp.platform.batik.pdf" > version="4.4.0.v200709060100-15-7w311822323166" > > <plugin id="org.apache.batik.pdf" version="1.6.0.v200711212055" > unpack="false" /> > > Cheers, > -- > Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River > Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member > http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm > > > >> >> >> >> From: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David M >> Williams >> Sent: Freitag, 22. Februar 2008 09:31 >> To: Cross project issues >> Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Ganymede M5: multiple >> differentversions of Orbit bundles? >> >> >> >> I have verified this problem, and multiple versions of batik is a blocking >> problem that needs to be fixed for M5. (The reason is the issues with >> import/export packages vs. require-bundle which was fixed "at last minute" >> by re-doing the Orbit S-build ... and if that doesn't sound familar, you >> haven't been keeping up with this list. :) You can search this list archive >> for more information). But, the earlier one's "don't play well" with the >> latest one, so anyone who uses batik bundles must move up to the latest >> version. I do not think the others, xerces, wsdl, javax.xml will cause real >> problems (though, it's not great). But, batik will cause things to really >> not work when multiple versions are installed. >> >> Here's what I narrowed down, though not sure it's the whole story ... >> >> I used update manager to install just a few things at a time. After each >> install, I'd search the plugins directory for batik bundles. >> >> One suspect ... BIRT ... was installed "early on", and found it did use the >> correct, latest version of batik.transcoder >> (org.apache.batik.transcoder_1.6.0.v200802090005.jar). >> >> After a few more things, I picked the whole "modeling and modeling tools" >> category, and an older version was installed >> (org.apache.batik.transcoder_1.6.0.v200711021015.jar). >> >> Tsk. tsk. Not only is this "old", it's "real old" ... going back two whole >> S-builds ... the M4 level still! There is a ton of stuff in that "models and >> modeling tools" category, so I have >> no idea which was the culprit ... but, suspect that narrows it down a >> little. >> >> I am not sure if there are other culprits or not, but everyone should check >> if you use batik, and make sure you are picking up the v200802090005 >> version. (I used 'transcoder' as a reference, >> not sure if all batik bundles have that same version). >> >> I've opened bug 219919 to track. >> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=219919 >> <https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=219919> >> >> Hope this helps, Let us know if questions/problems. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: "Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> To: "Cross project issues" <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Date: 02/21/2008 03:19 PM >> Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] Ganymede M5: multiple different >> versions of Orbit bundles? >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi there, >> >> looking at my Full Ganymede M5 install, I notice that there are some >> bundles duplicated with different versions. I'm not sure if that can >> make a bad impact, or how bad the impacat may be... but does >> anybody feel responsible for not building on top of the latest >> recommended Orbit build? >> >> Bundles in question are: >> < javax.wsdl >> < javax.xml >> < org.apache.batik.bridge >> < org.apache.batik.css >> < org.apache.batik.dom >> < org.apache.batik.dom.svg >> < org.apache.batik.ext.awt >> < org.apache.batik.parser >> < org.apache.batik.svggen >> < org.apache.batik.transcoder >> < org.apache.batik.util >> < org.apache.batik.xml >> < org.apache.commons.codec >> < org.apache.commons.logging >> < org.apache.xerces >> < org.apache.xml.resolver >> < org.apache.xml.serializer >> < org.w3c.dom.svg >> If anybody wants to verify, and has problems accessing the Staging site, >> current Ganymede is now available as an archived update site with >> .pack.gz bundles only (290MB total): >> http://download.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm/div/ganymede-200802210600.zip >> <http://download.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm/div/ganymede-200802210600.zip> >> >> Cheers, >> -- >> Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River >> Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member >> http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm <http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >> cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >> <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >> cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
<<winmail.dat>>