|RE: [cross-project-issues-dev] There will be no more Ganymatic buildsscheduled|
From: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David M Williams
Sent: Freitag, 22. Februar 2008 10:48
To: Cross project issues
Subject: RE: [cross-project-issues-dev] There will be no more Ganymatic buildsscheduled
Improvements can probably be made, but let's see how it goes before we do too much more work.
For the most part, I think a failure due to multiple activity would be rare, but I have seen one unexplainable
If, after another milestone or so, we fine that almost always (e.g 80%) of the time, a failure is "fixed" by just
running it again, then yes, we should do something to improve that. In WTP we do it by tagging what's in
head, and then retrieving the content with that tag ... that greatly narrows the range of possible conflict, since
that tagging operation is fairly quick and sort-of atomic. (not literally, but, close, I think, and similar in effect).
And yes, an sc file changed in the middle of a build would cause another build to be kicked off during
the following cycle.
Patches welcome :)
Back to the top