[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] RE: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Submitted EMF 2.4M3 to Ganymede
|
Yes, just this list please.
I think the planning council list really
should be for planning council specific business and planning council members,
mostly.
Cross-project is the one for everyone
to use for cross-project issues outside the planning council activities.
But .. don't feel too guilty ... at
least my mail filters work pretty good :)
"Mik Kersten"
<beatmik@xxxxxxx>
Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
11/07/2007 01:20 AM
Please respond to
Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
To
| "'Cross project issues'" <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
"'eclipse.org-planning-council'" <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| [cross-project-issues-dev] RE: [eclipse.org-planning-council]
Submitted EMF 2.4M3 to Ganymede |
|
+1 for the table, and having
everyone interested watch the page. I think that we should do what
we can to maintain a good signal to noise ratio with the cross projects
channels, and having mail go to everyone is noisy.
On a related note, I would
like to better understand of which messages to send to cross-projects-issues
and which to eclipse.org-planning-council in order to avoid feeling a tinge
of guilt whenever I reply all to both. Should we be sending notification/build/status
messages and questions like this just to -dev, or do they need to go to
both lists?
Mik
From: eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Nick Boldt
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 8:25 PM
To: eclipse. org-planning-council; Cross project issues
Subject: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Submitted EMF 2.4M3 to Ganymede
EMF 2.4.0M3 has been submitted.
Does anyone/everyone like the idea of using a signoff table like this one
[1] for Ganymede Milestones?
[1]http://wiki.eclipse.org/Europa/Winter_Maintenance_Signoffs
I proposed that idea for Europa Winter Maintenance on Oct 2, and as yet
haven't heard any objections. As M4 is the cutoff for Ganymede participation,
that would be the logical date to start such signoffs, if not right now
for M3.
Any +1s? If so I'll create a wiki page like the Europa one and send around
the link.
Nick
On Nov 6, 2007 2:16 PM, Doug Schaefer
<
DSchaefer@xxxxxxx >
wrote:
CDT has submitted our first
CDT 5 build to Ganymede as well.
Doug Schaefer, QNX Software
Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead, http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com
From: eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Kim Moir
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 2:13 PM
To: eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Submitted 3.4M3 to Ganymede
I've updated our Ganymede submission to reflect 3.4M3.
Kim
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev