Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] RE: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Submitted EMF 2.4M3 to Ganymede


Yes, just this list please.

I think the planning council list really should be for planning council specific business and planning council members, mostly.

Cross-project is the one for everyone to use for cross-project issues outside the planning council activities.

But .. don't feel too guilty ... at least my mail filters work pretty good :)





"Mik Kersten" <beatmik@xxxxxxx>
Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

11/07/2007 01:20 AM

Please respond to
Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To
"'Cross project issues'" <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'eclipse.org-planning-council'" <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
[cross-project-issues-dev] RE: [eclipse.org-planning-council]        Submitted EMF 2.4M3 to Ganymede





+1 for the table, and having everyone interested watch the page.   I think that we should do what we can to maintain a good signal to noise ratio with the cross projects channels, and having mail go to everyone is noisy.
 
On a related note, I would like to better understand of which messages to send to cross-projects-issues and which to eclipse.org-planning-council in order to avoid feeling a tinge of guilt whenever I reply all to both.  Should we be sending notification/build/status messages and questions like this just to -dev, or do they need to go to both lists?
 
Mik  
 
 
From: eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nick Boldt
Sent:
Tuesday, November 06, 2007 8:25 PM
To:
eclipse. org-planning-council; Cross project issues
Subject:
[eclipse.org-planning-council] Submitted EMF 2.4M3 to Ganymede

 
EMF 2.4.0M3 has been submitted.

Does anyone/everyone like the idea of using a signoff table like this one [1] for Ganymede Milestones?

[1]http://wiki.eclipse.org/Europa/Winter_Maintenance_Signoffs

I proposed that idea for Europa Winter Maintenance on Oct 2, and as yet haven't heard any objections. As M4 is the cutoff for Ganymede participation, that would be the logical date to start such signoffs, if not right now for M3.

Any +1s? If so I'll create a wiki page like the Europa one and send around the link.

Nick

On Nov 6, 2007 2:16 PM, Doug Schaefer < DSchaefer@xxxxxxx > wrote:

CDT has submitted our first CDT 5 build to Ganymede as well.

 

Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead,
http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com



From: eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kim Moir
Sent:
Tuesday, November 06, 2007 2:13 PM
To:
eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:
[eclipse.org-planning-council] Submitted 3.4M3 to Ganymede

 


I've updated our Ganymede submission to reflect 3.4M3.


Kim


_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list

eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
 _______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


Back to the top