Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Europa Fall Maintenance Maintenance
+1 for the critical fixes that we knew
were intended to be contributed into this re-spin.
Since we're now a full month after the
Fall Maintenance release and are still re-spinning, perhaps we should have
had a separate branch for these fixes so that contributions to the Winter
Maintenance would not have confused the issue? That might be something
to consider for Ganymede ...
Christian W. Damus
Component Lead, Eclipse OCL
IBM Rational Sofware
Europa Project Leads,
|Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
10/31/07 07:34 AM
Please respond to
Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Europa
Fall Maintenance Maintenance|
Please vote, on this mailing list, whether we should be updating the Europa
Update Site and the Europa download site with the re-re-spin. It appears
that individual projects have decided to update their bits (that's fine)
and the Europa download packages are being updated (did we agree to that?),
so perhaps we'd all better just vote +1 on this re-re-spin for the Europa
Fall Maintenance to be moved to be the main Europa update site.
I'll take three or more +1s and no -1s by Friday morning as a go.
@ALL: How do we proceed with the Europa Update Site
content? From my point of
view there is too much confusion, no clear decision, no schedule, and no
green build at all.
P.S. The lack of a green build is that annoying siteArchiver/update
manager bug that corrupts pack200 files. The non-packed files seem good
and (when I get a moment) I'm working on the work-around temp fix.
[end of message]_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list