[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [cosmos-dev] RE: Additional values in the Component field for ERs
|
Hi,
I agree with setting up a separate Buzzilla Product Component for COSMOS documentation (cosmos.doc). Having separate product components are a good way to partition the differences between the Website and documentation.
I looked at what many other Eclipse project are doing and most have separate components for the Website and documents.
Thanks,
Richard Vasconi
Design and Information Development/Dept. CNPA
Phone: (919) 543-5210 (TL/441) Fax: (919) 543-5210
e-mail: vasconi@xxxxxxxxxx
Lotus Notes: Richard Vasconi/Raleigh/IBM
"Mohsin, Jimmy" <Jimmy.Mohsin@xxxxxx>
"Mohsin, Jimmy" <Jimmy.Mohsin@xxxxxx>
Sent by: cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
01/10/2008 03:03 PM
Please respond to
Cosmos Dev <cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
|
Tania,
So will be have “cosmos.qa” and “cosmos.doc” added to bugzilla to group QA and Documentation ERs?
Any dissenters against having these adds?
Thanks,
Jimmy Mohsin
Cell +1-609-635-1703
From: cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Whiteman
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 5:06 PM
To: Cosmos Dev
Subject: Re: [cosmos-dev] Additional values in the Component field for ERs
Tania Makins wrote on 01/09/2008 04:10:58 PM:
> Shouldn't we be using "cosmos.web" for documentation ERs?
Actually, I don't think it's a bad idea to have a separate cosmos.doc component. "cosmos.web" to me suggests maintainance of the web site, and having doc be part of that is confusing at best. Plus, even if Rich is the one who currently owns both the web site & the documentation, keeping them separate helps keep the work organized better, and allows web and doc to not necessarily both be owned by the same person in the future.
David_______________________________________________
cosmos-dev mailing list
cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmos-dev


