| 
 Hi Don, 
  
Thanks for the response (and to the other members of the 
COSMOS team who have responded to my query).  I will use the cosmos-dev 
list (which I've subscribed to) going forward, but wanted to be sure it was ok 
with the COSMOS leadership before doing so (and had only the initial 
committers list to go by in that respect). 
  
Just by way of general background, I have played productive 
roles in several earlier IETF O&M Area standardization efforts: WinSNMP 
Moderator(IETF spin-off to an industry forum), SNMPv2c originator, AgentX Chair, 
and SNMPv3 contributor.  I am optimistic about the potential for success in 
the MIB2RMDL effort based on industry need, previous work done in the IETF and 
elsewhere wrt SNMP MIB to XML conversion, and the concrete progress already made 
and/or roadmapped by the Muse and COSMOS projects. 
  
Cheers, 
BobN 
  
  
  
  Bob, 
    
  Thank you for 
  bringing this effort to my attention.  At a minimum, I intend to follow 
  the mailing list.  I can’t give you an official response, but I will give 
  you my personal opinions for now and let the project give you a more complete 
  formal answer later. 
    
  After reading the 
  presentation, I believe that the goals of MIB2RMDL align well with some COSMOS 
  data collection component requirements.  In particular, a standard 
  mapping between SNMP MIBs and a SOA resource model is needed and I believe 
  that IETF is a much better choice to organize this standardization effort than 
  attempting to do something ourselves.  A SNMP proxy based on Muse would 
  be even more useful as COSMOS has already committed to Muse and hopes to be 
  able to deliver such a proxy.  My primary concern at this point is that 
  it may prove somewhat difficult to achieve broad consensus on a common 
  approach at the metamodel layer, but that is not my area of expertise so I 
  will leave that for others to ponder.  
    
  I suspect that you 
  will receive an official response of some sort within the next week, but for 
  now, the best way to contact the broader COSMOS community would be a post on 
  our development mailing list cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx. 
    
  Regards, 
    
  Don 
  Ebright 
    
  
  
   
   
  From: Natale, 
  Bob [mailto:RNATALE@xxxxxxxxx]  Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 5:41 
  PM To: Ebright, 
  Don Subject: Eclipse COSMOS, 
  Apache Muse, and IETF MIB2RMDL effort  
    
  
  
  
  
  I am contacting 
  you because of your participation on the COSMOS project.  If possible 
  could you please:  
  
  
  1. Review the 
  IETF MIB to Resource Model Description Language (MIB2RMDL) info below and let 
  me know whether you think that collaboration between COSMOS and MIB2RMDL makes 
  sense.  
  
  
  2. Give me an 
  update wrt COSMOS progress.  
  
  
  3. Let me know 
  whether you see a productive relationship between Muse, COSMOS, and 
  MIB2RMDL.  
  
  
  At the IETF 
  O&M Area meetings in Prague (March 18-23), we held a mini-BOF on 
  the topic of standardizing a methodology to convert SNMP MIBs to SOA/WS 
  resource model artifacts (tagged as "MIB to Resource Model Description 
  Language" (MIB2RMDL), using "Language" very loosely in this context).  
  The purpose of the MIB2RMDL effort is to enable unified service/network/system 
  management from the SOA/WS management level by making the virtual library of 
  data models represented by SNMP MIBs and the management 
  instrumentation supporting them more directly accessible to SOA/WS 
  management applications.  
  
  
  
  
  The O&M Area 
  decided to proceed with further investigation of the MIB2RMDL idea, with the 
  first step being to establish an e-mail list for discussion of the proposal. 
  If you would like to participate or even just monitor the discussion, you can 
  subscribe at https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib2rdml.  
  
  
  My hope is that 
  the discussion will lead to sufficient definition and further acceptance of 
  the MIB2RMDL proposal so that we can charter a formal Working Group at IETF-69 
  in Chicago 
  this July.   
  
  
  To jumpstart the 
  e-mail list discussion, I will produce and post an updated (-01) I-D in the 
  next week or so, incorporating input/feedback from the Prague meeting and 
  anything else that might develop on this list in the meantime. (Co-authors 
  welcomed.)  The initial (-00) exploratory I-D is available at http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-natale-snmp-mibs-to-ontology-00.txt, 
  but I recommend waiting for the -01 update.  
  
  
  If you know of 
  other individuals or groups who might be interested in or able to contribute 
  to this work, please forward this message to 
  them.  
  
  
  (MITRE is a 
  non-profit and vendor neutral federally funded research and development 
  center -- www.mitre.org.)  
  
     The 
  contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains 
  information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named addressee or an 
  authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone 
  else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then 
  destroy it.  
 |