+1. Exemplary implementation reads better
as well.
Cheers,
Joel
-----Original Message-----
From: cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Marius Slavescu
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007
10:14 AM
To: Cosmos Dev
Subject: Re: [cosmos-dev] Elevator
Speech
I my mind COSMOS was intended to provide an extensible
framework that will allow interoperability and integration of system management
tools (open source or proprietary), beside of the exploration and reference
implementation of some existing or emerging standards in this space.
If
we tag the result of the project as being just demonstrative instead of
exemplary, in my view we may reduce the attractiveness of the project.
In
the incubation phase it may not reach the exemplary level, which should be
fine.
Thanks !
Marius Slavescu
IBM
Tivoli Autonomic Computing - Toronto Lab
Phone: 905-413-3610
|
Oliver E Cole
<oec@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent
by: cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
03/21/2007 09:40 AM
|
Please
respond to
Cosmos Dev <cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
|
To
|
Cosmos Dev <cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
|
[cosmos-dev] Elevator Speech
|
|
Ok, here is my first cut at the elevator
speech for COSMOS, so we have
something to yell about at the beginning of the
phone call. Please feel
free to yell by email beforehand....
Specifically, do each of you
think that your management would agree that they
want to continue to
":invest" in COSMOS with this elevator
pitch?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COSMOS is an open source, vendor neutral effort
to explore emerging
standards in the context of system monitoring.
COSMOS is developing a
demonstration implementation using those open
standards to prove the
concepts. Standards being explored are:
SML, CML, WSDM..
Questions:
------------
i) Can we list the specific standards that
we are exploring? Or do
we want to say "Standards being explored
include..." Is my list
complete enough?
ii) It would be more powerful to say that
montoring vendors are
cooperating together to do this. Can we?
Something like "COSMOS is an
open source, vendor neutral effort to explore
emerging standards in the
context of system monitoring. The effort
includes monitoring vendors
IBM, CA, CompuWare and GroundWork."
--oec
--
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Oliver E Cole
oec@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
OC Systems
www.ocsystems.com
9990 Lee Hwy, Suite 270
(v) 703.359.8160
x160
Fairfax, VA, 22030
(f)
703.359.8161
_______________________________________________
cosmos-dev mailing list
cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmos-dev
=00