[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [corrosion-dev] Removing Corrosion from SimRel 2020-09?
|
My personal perception of SimRel is "Orbit of bigger scale": a set
of building blocks for other components/products that passed
standard release procedure and well aligned with other components. A
kind of "QC" stamp from EF, yes.
Again, this is just a personal perception, and I know that reality
is different, but it is aligned with what I would expect from the
Eclipse component/product.
From this perspective I agree with Nico:
> Not sure. Users will perceive this as "Rust development effort
in Eclipse being abandoned". Or at least demoted to "second class
citizen".
If you asked what the community thinks, this is it :)
Regards,
AF
08.06.2020 11:11, Aleksandar Kurtakov
пишет:
Not sure. Users will
perceive this as "Rust development effort in Eclipse
being abandoned". Or at least demoted to "second class
citizen".
Technically, while it's
just a little hurdle for those new to Rust, those ones
would perhaps take another look at CLion instead when
they don't find "Eclipse for Rust developers" as a
SimRel anymore ;)
As I'm not sure this is properly understood:*
* "Eclipse for Rust developers" will still be available
and released together with all the rest
Sent from my BlackBerry — the
most secure mobile device
Hi all,
I'm considering whether it makes sense to
have Corrosion part of SimRel, and what is the
added-value of being in SimRel for Corrosion?
IMO, the vast majority of Corrosion users
install it via Marketplace or use the "Eclipse
IDE for Rust Developers" from EPP; in case of
Marketplace they then get updates by the
Corrosion p2 repo, in case of EPP, via SimRel.
EPP allows to consume directly other p2
repos than SimRel, so I'm thinking that maybe
it'd be better to just stop pushing Corrosion
to SimRel (that's one less step to do in case
of new release) and instead just make the EPP
package reference Corrosion p2 repo.
I believe this would reduce the maintenance
effort and give Corrosion more control over
what it ships to EPP without intermediary
steps. And, as mentioned above, I don't
foresee it degrading the user experience in
any way.
Does anyone have concerns with that?
+ 1 from me. If simrel had the fileextension
search (like marketplace) in some way I might
have seen this as a reason to keep it but without
it Rust in simrel doesn't make any sense to me.
If not, I'll start taking those changes in
SimRel and EPP soon after 2020-06 is released.
Cheers,
_______________________________________________
corrosion-dev mailing list
corrosion-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/corrosion-dev
--
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse Team
_______________________________________________
corrosion-dev mailing list
corrosion-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/corrosion-dev
--
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse Team
_______________________________________________
corrosion-dev mailing list
corrosion-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/corrosion-dev
