| RE: [corona-dev] RE: Project container manager |
|
The question is, do we need it for the demo? Consider the Project Open use case that we have defined. (PC ==
ProjectContainer) 1. PC-Explorer
interacts with PC-Cache 2. PC-Cache
looks up locally cached PC’s 3. PC-Explorer
requests PC-Cache to open PC 4. PC-Cache
attempts web srv call to remote PC-Manager 5. PC-Cache
returns PC to PC-Explorer 6. PC-Explorer
displays PC-View 7. PC-View
shows multiple PC-View pages (using PC-Repositories) The only web srv call happen at step 4. However, this can be removed
without impacting the use case. How do you see the demo working? -----Original Message----- It seems that we are going to have the access to server via WS soon :) If so, there is probably no point in making a temporary implentation of
this. That would be perfect. Marcin >Yes I am already in the process changing to the more generic >ContainerManager. Most of the methods moved into the
ContextContainer >object except for serialization/de-serialization which is specific
to >the container type. Are you working on the ContainerCache object?
When >I have the reading/writing of containers working again I will check
it >in and you can look. I may have it done for you look to at Monday.
I >think I started to create the WSDL for ProjectContainer Interface I
just >used java2wsdl I'll send you how I did this and then you can
generate >the new WSDL based upon the new interfaced. > >FYI > >Glenn Everitt > > > The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only.
It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named
addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it
to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and
then destroy it. _______________________________________________ corona-dev mailing list corona-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/corona-dev |