| RE: [corona-dev] ProjectContainer Definition |
|
The assumptions I was making were: 1. The
URI is the location of the repository 2. The
URI’s scheme would (normally) be the protocol used to interact with the
repository 3. The
Type would be additional, container context specific, details on how to use the
repository. For example: URI: http://www.eclipse.org/corona TYPE: website DESCRIPTION: URI: http://www.eclipse.org/corona/services TYPE: webservice DESCRIPTION: URI: http://www.eclipse.org/corona/team.xml TYPE: teamlist DESCRIPTION: List of Would you please update these 3 examples showing your assumption of
TYPE and use of KIND as well. Thanks. -----Original Message----- Firstly, as I'm familliar with the respository definition, the URI is intended to be an identifier which is not neccessary any access
parameter. But still, how would we indicate for instance a Web Service call from a
XML file laying on an HTTP server? I'm affraid that some uri schemes
are not enough. Marcin >Wouldn't the URI have this information based upon the URI's
scheme? For >example: >* http:// >* cvs:// >* jdbc:// >* file:// > > The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only.
It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named
addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it
to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and
then destroy it. _______________________________________________ corona-dev mailing list corona-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/corona-dev |