[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [corona-dev] Communication Alternatives
|
Defenitely it makes sense to me. So WS would be for management while ECF
for collaboration.
Hawkins, Joel napisał(a):
I think both have a part to play. We need to support ECF by providing
context, and there will be cases where a side effect of a Web Service
interaction may be a series of ECF events, but I don’t think we need
to use ECF as a communication backbone. I believe Web Services is more
appropriate. Does that make sense?
-----Original Message-----
*From:* corona-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:corona-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Marcin Okraszewski
*Sent:* Thursday, June 01, 2006 8:58 AM
*To:* Corona development
*Subject:* Re: [corona-dev] Communication Alternatives
I wouldn't say synchronicity is the main factor for me. It was rather
a releaser of the discussion and has a minor importance for me. It
seems you are rather for WS + ECF, am I right? As I look at it, this
way seems to be tempting but I'm afraid that we will create a
"spaghetti" solution.
Marcin
The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it.
