|Re: [config-dev] BALLOT: Patent license for Jakarta Config project re-ballot|
+1 for CPL. For a small spec such as Jakarta Config CPL makes sense; the IPL for Config would provide more issues than benefits, since a variety of projects implements some configuration which may be considered a Config subset, no matter it was not intended.
From: config-dev <config-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Dmitry Kornilov <dmitry.kornilov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 2, 2021 7:09 PM
To: Jakarta Config project developer discussions <config-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [External] : [config-dev] BALLOT: Patent license for Jakarta Config project re-ballot
As I described in my previous email (subj. “Project re-ballot”), I would like project committers to vote for a patent license which we should use for the project re-ballot. Options are:
The ballot will end next Tuesday, Sep 9th at 12:00 CEST.
Back to the top