Re: [cme-dev] Components/Owners for bugzilla?

[Bill Harrison <harrisn@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm happy to take composition for now, but would like to note that over the
longer term, I  am not the right person to be responsible for bugs in
various concern assemblers, like citcat.jikesbt or citcat.jdt etc. However,
a developer using CME  can't be expected to make the distinction, so I'm
willing to act as the forwarding point until it becomes a problem.

                          - Bill

http://www.research.ibm.com/people/h/harrisn/

derevaun seraun ...


Andrew Clement <CLEMAS@xxxxxxxxxx>@eclipse.org on 04/22/2004 04:24:53 AM

Please respond to cme-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

Sent by:    cme-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx


To:    cme-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc:
Subject:    [cme-dev] Components/Owners for bugzilla?




We need to determine the list of components and their owners for bugzilla
CME reporting/tracking.  At the moment we have one component 'CME' and the
default person who gets emailed for bugs raised against that component is
cme-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx (very useful!)

I think we should name coarse grained areas - I can't initially see any
point in naming puma/conman/etc as individual components as the
users/raisers won't know which underlying code to pick.  So I was thinking
of components like:

Docs
User Interface
Composition
Query

I need default component owners too - I was possibly thinking of Peri for
Query, BillH for Composition, Sian for User Interface and maybe Helen for
Docs.  Of course, these are only the initial contacts - they are perfectly
free to reassign the bugs as appropriate once they've done some initial
analysis.

Comments?

Andy.

===
Andy Clement
CME Development