[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [che-dev] [ecd-pmc] Committer Election for Samantha Dawley on Eclipse Che™ has started
|
Hi Wayne,
------ Original Message ------
From: "Wayne Beaton" <wayne.beaton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Eclipse cloud development PMC discussions" <ecd-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Eclipse Che™ Dev List" <che-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 22/03/2022 16:47:24
Subject: Re: [che-dev] [ecd-pmc] Committer Election for Samantha Dawley on Eclipse Che™ has started
Who the candidate works for or what they've been hired to do are not relevant in a committer election. Nor is what the candidate may do or is expected to do in the future relevant in a committer election.
I agree in general with that sentiment, however, being paid to work on a project allows you to spend significant time on it, so it's relevant information nevertheless.
A committer nomination statement must cite specific contributions to the open source project.
What specific contributions has the candidate made to the Eclipse Che project?
If I understand you correctly, you object that the linked bugs are for the Red Hat CRW product and not the Eclipse Che project, right? Or do you think the work shown is insufficient?
/Thomas
