[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-ui-dev] Disabled Icons
|
Great thanks, the
CDT project is quite a bit behind that. They're still referencing the hover
state and the use of the image is inconsistant. I'll probably go through the
plugin.xml files this weekend and get them sorted out and posted to the list.
Just out of
curiosity, is there a reason for the c,d,e directory structure? Conventionally,
I would have had them in a single directory with a suffix. It makes exporting
and archiving tremendously easier.
By the way I didn't
file a bug, but I still feel like your "plus" moniker isn't clear enough - they
lose their shape on higher resolution moniters. I really would recommend
squaring off the corners.
"The
"new" decorator icon looks more like one of the gems from bejeweled.
I think it is supposed to be a + sign, but it looks like a diamond to
me."
-bill
Bill ..
fyi...
----- Forwarded by Andree
Proulx/Toronto/IBM on 05/21/2004 02:00 PM -----
| Michael Van
Meekeren/Ottawa/IBM
05/20/2004 10:19 PM
|
|
To
| Andree
Proulx/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| Re: Fw: [cdt-ui-dev]
Disabled IconsLink |
|
tool owners can ship color , enabled and disabled icons
and use them as before. However what we have done is remove the color
icons use and use only enbled and disabled. We no longer have a
preference to use brighter color icons.
There are some notes about what we have done here:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=53617#c42
/michael
| Andree
Proulx/Toronto/IBM
05/20/2004 01:06 PM
|
|
To
| Michael Van
Meekeren/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| Re: Fw: [cdt-ui-dev]
Disabled IconsLink |
|
sorry, I meant to ask: Do tool owners have to make any
code changes to use enabled vs colored folders?
| Michael Van
Meekeren/Ottawa/IBM
05/20/2004 01:03 PM
|
|
To
| Andree
Proulx/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| Re: Fw: [cdt-ui-dev]
Disabled IconsLink |
|
No they still need to use the disabled icon folder.
SWT has not suitably fixed this problem for us.
| Andree
Proulx/Toronto/IBM
05/19/2004 06:17 PM
|
|
To
| Michael Van
Meekeren/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| Fw: [cdt-ui-dev]
Disabled Icons |
|
Michael,
Can you please answer this question for me:
Do you know if the CDT development team needs to make
changes to stop using the disabled icon folder, or were these images handled
at the Eclipse SWT level?
andrée
----- Forwarded by Andree Proulx/Toronto/IBM on 05/19/2004 06:14 PM
-----
| Bill Bull
<bbull@xxxxxxx>
05/19/2004 03:44 PM
|
|
To
| Andree
Proulx/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| RE: [cdt-ui-dev]
Disabled Icons |
|
Ok, great that answers my next question. (Amount of
saturation and brightness for disabled images.) I'm attaching a summary sheet
of the current images for your reference. I'll merge the new images that match
and proceed with the variations. I assume the enabled folders will now have
full color icons. Do you know if the CDT develpment team needs to make changes
to stop using the disabled icon folder, or were these images handled at the
Eclipse SWT level?
-bill
-----Original
Message-----
From: Andree Proulx
[mailto:aiproulx@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 2:32
PM
To: Bill Bull
Cc:
cdt-ui-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [cdt-ui-dev] Disabled
Icons
In Eclipse 3.0 the icon
folders starting with "c" are deprecated.
Colored icons are stored in "e" folders. E stands
for enabled.
Disabled icons for toolbars are still required.
Find included the photoshop action
script to create the disabled state.
andrée
Bill Bull
<bbull@xxxxxxx>
Sent by:
cdt-ui-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
05/19/2004 02:10 PM
|
|
To
| "'cdt-ui-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx'"
<cdt-ui-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| [cdt-ui-dev] Diabled
Icons |
|
In the CDT, should all disabled
versions of icons be procedurally generated?
In the
org.eclipse.cdt.ui_2.0.0 folder there are a number of subfolders
with
disabled versions. (dlcl16, dtool16, etc.) These also seem to be
incomplete
- not all of the icons in the corresponding active folder have
diabled
version.
Am I looking at something depricated, or just not
up to speed with the
latest way of doing things?
-bill
_______________________________________________
cdt-ui-dev
mailing
list
cdt-ui-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-ui-dev
[attachment "cdt-icons.zip" deleted by Michael Van
Meekeren/Ottawa/IBM]
