[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-patch] Proposed patch for bug 160540 (incorrect offsets inPDOMPointerType and PDOMQualifierType)
|
I agree that Bugzilla is a better system. I was hoping that I was hitting
a general audience, but Doug is most likely right and I doubt many people
watch this list anymore.
As Doug has mentioned to me before, we should make it mandatory to
subscribe to at least one inbox (and more if the committer is interested).
===========================
Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM CDT Team
IBM Toronto
http://www.eclipse.org/cdt
Doug Schaefer
<DSchaefer@xxxxxx
m> To
Sent by: "CDT patches and commits are posted
cdt-patch-bounces to this list."
@eclipse.org <cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
31/10/2006 09:13 Subject
AM RE: [cdt-patch] Proposed patch for
bug 160540 (incorrect offsets
inPDOMPointerType and
Please respond to PDOMQualifierType)
"CDT patches and
commits are
posted to this
list."
<cdt-patch@eclips
e.org>
Well, I'd have to say that less than 10% of patches get notifications here.
And for a long time there were none. If you are only following this list,
you've missed a lot.
Bugzilla is definitive, which is why I prefer to follow it. The traffic
isn't too large and it gives me a good sense of the issues that people are
running into, even if I don't follow the details of each bug thoroughly.
Doug Schaefer
QNX Software Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead
http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-patch-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cdt-patch-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Ploett, Norbert
> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 4:24 AM
> To: CDT patches and commits are posted to this list.
> Subject: AW: [cdt-patch] Proposed patch for bug 160540 (incorrect offsets
> inPDOMPointerType and PDOMQualifierType)
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> I was remotely aware that it can be possible to "watch" an inbox, but
have
> not yet done so. This would give me _all_ the changes from all the bugs
in
> the inbox, right? Not just the patches.
>
> So far I've been looking at the pathes list with some interest, though
> I'll admit I rarely have the time to look into a patch in greater detail.
>
> Summary: I did loosely follow the traffic on cdt-patch, I could also
adapt
> to a different procedure if that's agreed on.
>
>
> Norbert
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: cdt-patch-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-patch-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Im Auftrag von Chris Recoskie
> Gesendet: Montag, 30. Oktober 2006 16:53
> An: CDT patches and commits are posted to this list.
> Betreff: RE: [cdt-patch] Proposed patch for bug 160540 (incorrect offsets
> inPDOMPointerType and PDOMQualifierType)
>
> We at IBM continue to use it because it's sort of a guaranteed way for a
> greater number of committers to see that someone new is contributing.
Not
> everyone watches all the inboxes.
>
> ===========================
>
> Chris Recoskie
> Team Lead, IBM CDT Team
> IBM Toronto
> http://www.eclipse.org/cdt
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-patch mailing list
> cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-patch
_______________________________________________
cdt-patch mailing list
cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-patch
