[cdt-patch] pre-translation fixes

[Tanya Wolff <twolff@xxxxxxxxxx>]

There is a problem with single quotes
in messages which are formatted with MessageFormat (message contains a
{0}). These single quotes need to be escaped with another single quote,
not a backslash. If the message is not formatted with MessageFormat, then
single quotes are ok.

Thanks,
Tanya

Index: ChangeLog
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/tools/org.eclipse.cdt-core/org.eclipse.cdt.ui/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.660
diff -u -r1.660 ChangeLog
--- ChangeLog	20 Mar 2005 22:45:16 -0000	1.660
+++ ChangeLog	23 Mar 2005 15:45:23 -0000
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2005-03-23 Tanya wolff
+	Fix for a single quote problem.
+	* refactor/org.eclipse.cdt.internal.corext.refactoring/refactoring.properties
+	
 2005-03-20 Alain Magloire
 	Fix for 77978.
 	* src/org/eclipse/cdt/internal/ui/actions/AddBlockCommentAction.java
Index: refactor/org/eclipse/cdt/internal/corext/refactoring/refactoring.properties
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/tools/org.eclipse.cdt-core/org.eclipse.cdt.ui/refactor/org/eclipse/cdt/internal/corext/refactoring/refactoring.properties,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.9 refactoring.properties
--- refactor/org/eclipse/cdt/internal/corext/refactoring/refactoring.properties	17 Jun 2004 19:36:03 -0000	1.9
+++ refactor/org/eclipse/cdt/internal/corext/refactoring/refactoring.properties	23 Mar 2005 15:45:30 -0000
@@ -426,7 +426,7 @@
 PullUpRefactoring.method_not_accessible=Method ''{0}'' referenced in one of the pulled elements is not accessible from type ''{1}''
 PullUpRefactoring.different_method_return_type=Method ''{0}'' declared in type''{1}'' has a different return type than its pulled up counterpart, which will result in compile errors if you proceed
 PullUpRefactoring.different_field_type=Field ''{0}'' declared in type ''{1}'' has a different type than its pulled up counterpart
-PullUpRefactoring.static_method=Method ''{0}'' declared in type ''{1}'' is \'static\', which will result in compile errors if you proceed
+PullUpRefactoring.static_method=Method ''{0}'' declared in type ''{1}'' is ''static'', which will result in compile errors if you proceed
 PullUpRefactoring.lower_visibility=Method ''{0}'' declared in type ''{1}'' has visibility lower than \'protected\', which will result in compile errors if you proceed
 PullUpRefactoring.preview=Preparing preview
 PullUpRefactoring.calculating_required=Calculating required members
@@ -454,14 +454,14 @@
 ChangeSignatureRefactoring.duplicate_name=Duplicate parameter name: {0}
 
 MoveMembersRefactoring.Move_Members=Move Members
-MoveMembersRefactoring.compile_errors=Operation can't be performed due to compile errors in ''{0}''. Please fix errors first.
+MoveMembersRefactoring.compile_errors=Operation can''t be performed due to compile errors in ''{0}''. Please fix errors first.
 MoveMembersRefactoring.deleteMembers= delete members
 MoveMembersRefactoring.addMembers= add members
 MoveMembersRefactoring.referenceUpdate= update reference to moved member
 MoveMembersRefactoring.Checking_preconditions=Checking preconditions...
 MoveMembersRefactoring.static_declaration=Static members can be declared only in top level or static types.
 MoveMembersRefactoring.multi_var_fields=Currently, only field declarations with single variable declaration fragments can be moved.
-MoveMembersRefactoring.only_public_static_final=Only ''public static final'' fields with variable initializers can be moved to an interface.
+MoveMembersRefactoring.only_public_static_final=Only 'public static final' fields with variable initializers can be moved to an interface.
 MoveMembersRefactoring.Object=Move is not allowed on members declared in 'java.lang.Object'.
 MoveMembersRefactoring.binary=Pull up is not allowed on members of binary types.
 MoveMembersRefactoring.read_only=Pull up is not allowed on members of read-only types.
@@ -729,7 +729,7 @@
 ReorgUtils.16=class folder ''{0}''
 ReorgUtils.17=package fragment root ''{0}''
 ReorgUtils.18=type ''{0}''
-ReorgUtils.19=new {0}() '{...'}
+ReorgUtils.19=new {0}() ''{...''}
 ReorgUtils.20=anonymous type ''{0}''
 DeleteChangeCreator.1=Delete elements
 DeleteRefactoring.1=Analyzing...
@@ -751,7 +751,7 @@
 IntroduceFactory.examiningSelection=Examining selection...
 IntroduceFactory.notAConstructorInvocation=Selected entity is not a constructor invocation or definition.
 #
-IntroduceFactory.noASTNodeForConstructorSearchHit=Can\'t find AST node for constructor search hit @ [''{0}'', ''{1}'']: <''{2}''> in translation unit ''{3}''
+IntroduceFactory.noASTNodeForConstructorSearchHit=Can''t find AST node for constructor search hit @ [''{0}'', ''{1}'']: <''{2}''> in translation unit ''{3}''
 IntroduceFactory.unexpectedInitializerNodeType=Unexpected AST node type for initializer when searching for constructor call: \'''{0}''\' in translation unit ''{1}''
 IntroduceFactory.noConstructorCallNodeInsideFoundVarbleDecl=Couldn\'t find AST node for constructor call inside ''{0}''
 IntroduceFactory.unexpectedASTNodeTypeForConstructorSearchHit=Unexpected AST node type for constructor search hit: ''{0}'' in translation unit ''{1}''