[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-patch] FW: c/c++ refactoring contribution
|
The bugzilla for this is:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=61312
Thanks,
Doug Schaefer
Ottawa Lab, IBM Rational Software Division
"Schorn, Markus" <Markus.Schorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: cdt-patch-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
03/09/2005 09:38 AM
Please respond to
cdt-patch
To
<cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
RE: [cdt-patch] FW: c/c++ refactoring contribution
As the c/c++ refactoring does not make use of any jdt-dependent
classes you can actually just remove the dependency in the plugin.xml
of the ltk-plugins, it'll work.
The clean solution obviously is to remove the dependency itself.
Markus.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-patch-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cdt-patch-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Recoskie, Chris
> Sent: Mittwoch, 09. März 2005 15:27
> To: cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [cdt-patch] FW: c/c++ refactoring contribution
>
> Ugh... a dependency on jdt.core really screws things up for TI. We
> strip out the JDT and PDE for the regular version of our product, but
> include them in our SDK version. I suspect that there are other ISVs
> that do the same.
>
> Is there a practical way to remove this dependency?
>
> ___________________________________________
>
> Chris Recoskie
> Software Designer
> IDE Frameworks Group
> Texas Instruments, Toronto
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cdt-patch-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cdt-patch-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On
> > Behalf Of Schorn, Markus
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 9:16 AM
> > To: cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [cdt-patch] FW: c/c++ refactoring contribution
> >
> > here is my initial contribution for c/c++ refactoring. You
> may want to
> > pass on some of the info to the community when putting the code into
> > the CVS repository.
> > This does not come as CVS patch, as this is not a change to an
> > existing plugin.
> >
> >
> > Plugins:
> > ========
> > + org.eclipse.cdt.refactoring
> > + src
> > + org.eclipse.cdt.internal.refactoring
> > + org.eclipse.cdt.internal.refactoring.scanner
> > + org.eclipse.cdt.internal.refactoring.ui
> > + org.eclipse.cdt.refactoring
> > + org.eclipse.cdt.refactoring.tests
> > + src
> > + org.eclipse.cdt.core.tests
> >
> > + org.eclipse.cdt.refactoring.tests
> >
> > As the cdt.refactoring plugin depends on ltk.ui.refactoring there is
> > an implicit dependency on jdt.core. See
> >
> > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=61312
> >
> >
> > Licensing:
> > ==========
> > The code is licensed under the EPL, if that is not
> apropriate I could
> > change that.
> > I use a header slightly different to the one used inside CDT. It is
> the
> > one suggested at
> > http://www.eclipse.org/legal/copyrightandlicensenotice.html
> > (and the one approved by my legal department).
> >
> >
> > Test cases:
> > ===========
> > I have ported the existing test cases for renaming to the new
> >
> > implementation and started to extend them with further tests.
> >
> > There will be more to do for me.
> >
> >
> > Status:
> > =======
> > The core of the rename-refactoring is implemented. Regression tests
> that
> > passed with the old version also pass with the new version. There is
> one
> > exception to that for which I'll file a bug today.
> >
> >
> > The new version additionally fixes the bugs: 72612, 72717, 72605,
> 79231,
> >
> > 79282, 79295, 72620, 72617.
> >
> > It is possible to register renaming participants with the same
> extension
> > point jdt is using. One of the regression tests shows how
> to do this.
> > This could be of interest to the debugger (renaming a
> function with a
> >
> > breakpoint sitting on it?)
> >
> > Undo/Redo is working by means of the refactoring framework. To check
> it
> > out you have to enable the 'Java Coding' Action Set in your
> perspective.
> >
> >
> > Effects on the GUI:
> > ===================
> > The plugin adds a menu item to the context menu of the CDT-Editor.
> > (Refactoring - Rename (work in progress)).
> >
> >
> > What's next:
> > ============
> > Starting after Easter I plan to
> >
> > * finish the checks for shadowing/redeclaring vars/funcs/types.
> > * extend test cases.
> > * handle macros.
> > * extend test cases.
> > * integrate new rename, undo and redo into the GUI.
> > * remove old renaming facility.
> >
> > Markus.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-patch mailing list
> cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-patch
>
_______________________________________________
cdt-patch mailing list
cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-patch
