[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-patch] Applied [HEAD] - Further preprocessor errors
|
Yes ... I think so. I think that for the next little while, any patches
which would be stabilizing and worthwhile to customers we should cross
migrate to 1.2. At least for a couple of weeks while people are still
banging on it and before we throw ourselves into the 3.0 work.
Thanks,
Thomas
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Camelon [mailto:jcamelon@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2003 7:14 PM
> To: cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [cdt-patch] Applied [HEAD] - Further preprocessor errors
>
>
> Did you want the previous patch as well?
> Refer to "Applied [HEAD] Parser fixes for ANSI C" from yesterday.
>
> JohnC
>
> cdt-patch-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 10/25/2003 08:39:24 AM:
>
> > +1 from me
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Thomas
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: John Camelon [mailto:jcamelon@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 5:35 PM
> > > To: cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [cdt-patch] Applied [HEAD] - Further preprocessor errors
> > >
> > >
> > > Again, QNX-ers, let me know if you want this in 1_2 as well.
> > >
> > > CORE
> > > Fixed Bug 45476 : preprocessor macro "defined"
> not handled
> > > correctly
> > > Fixed Bug 45477 : macro redefines prevent further parsing
> > >
> > > TESTS
> > > Added testBug45476() to ScannerTestCase.
> > > Added testBug45477() to ScannerTestCase.
> > >
> > > JohnC
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cdt-patch mailing list
> > > cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-patch
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdt-patch mailing list
> > cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-patch
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-patch mailing list
> cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-patch
>
