RE: [cdt-patch] Patch proposal for Bug 43174

[John Camelon <jcamelon@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thomas wrote:
> Fully agree with this.  One of the major feature parity issues 
> which customers (of the CDT and derived products) have is the 
> fact that we _do_ have code completion for projects. 
> 
> I can certainly explain to existing customers about the necessity
> i.e. performance improvement) of only providing information from 
> included header files (promote proper developer discipline, clean
> code yadadada).  I can _not_ realistically tell them that the entire
> feature is _just_gone_ and that they will have to live with it.

I would suggest then that perhaps we should have a preference on the 
Code Assist page along the lines of "provide completions for elements 
not included" (or something with better wording), in order to support 
both types of developer. 

John