Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Applied [HEAD]: Second attempt at [cdt-patch] Fix for PR 39501


Thanks for the help Victor.  That fix gets us down to under 100 failures out of ~6900 tests in TortureTest.  
I try and run TortureTest in quick parse mode on a regular basis now, I look forward to when we can get the failure count down to zero so that I can include it in my regression for validating parser patches.

JohnC



"Victor Mozgin" <vic_mozgin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: cdt-patch-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx

07/03/2003 01:23 PM

Please respond to
cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx

To
<cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
Re: Rejected: [cdt-patch] Fix for PR 39501





        That wasn't difficult (it wasn't used anyway). But are platform requirements documented? Is it 1.3 that should be supported, or anything earlier, or?..
 
            /Vic
----- Original Message -----
From: John Camelon
To: cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 5:31 PM
Subject: Rejected: [cdt-patch] Fix for PR 39501


I'm sorry Victor, I cannot apply this patch.  In the core.tests you use java.util.regexp which is exclusively a Java 1.4 package.  

As far as I know, we still have to support Java 1.3.  


Hopefully it won't be too hard for you to fix ...


JohnC



"Victor Mozgin" <vic_mozgin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by:
cdt-patch-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx

07/02/2003 12:00 PM

Please respond to
cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx


To
<cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
[cdt-patch] Fix for PR 39501







   - Fixed PR 39501 : Parser problems with throw clauses.
  - Improved filtering of expected failures/inconclusives in TortureTest.

          /Vic[attachment "core20030702.patch" deleted by John Camelon/Ottawa/IBM] [attachment "core.tests20030702.patch" deleted by John Camelon/Ottawa/IBM]

Attachment: core20030702.patch
Description: Binary data

Attachment: core.tests20030702-2.patch
Description: Binary data


Back to the top