Re: [cdt-patch] Support for old K&R-style C function definitions

[John Camelon <jcamelon@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Victor, please update your workspace
and create a new fresh patch, I cannot find a way to make this apply to
what is currently in HEAD since I applied your earlier patch while trying
to make up my mind about the whole thing.  

Sorry for sitting on the fence so long
with this ... I was holding off on doing K&R work until we had a more
mature parser architecture, which could allow for us to handle language
variants through subclassing/delegation and a meticulous, proven strategy
for describing toolchains and compilers.  Despite these reservations
(and outright fear),  K&R support will lend us a bit more credibility
in the embedded world, and help validate the extensibility of our architecture.
 

Thanks
JohnC

"Victor Mozgin" <vic_mozgin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: cdt-patch-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx

06/16/2003 06:10 AM

Please respond to
cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx

To	<cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	[cdt-patch] Support for old K&R-style C function definitions

        Implemented support
for old K&R-style C function definitions, with proper binding of parameters
for outline view. This solves PR 7541, 35320 and 38434.
 
        To apply:
patches 20030614 (previous one) and 20030616
are independent, but they will conflict during automatic merge. To apply
both fixes, use core_/test_cumulative patches. They contain both 20030614
and 20030616 patches merged together.
 
        /Vic[attachment
"test20030616.patch" deleted by John Camelon/Ottawa/IBM] [attachment
"test_cumulative.patch" deleted by John Camelon/Ottawa/IBM] [attachment
"core20030616.patch" deleted by John Camelon/Ottawa/IBM] [attachment
"core_cumulative.patch" deleted by John Camelon/Ottawa/IBM]