I agree, that makes sense.
Thanks a lot!
On Dienstag, 13. Juli 2021 03:30:55 CEST Marc-Andre Laperle wrote: > Hi, > > It’s not important for M1 but often with those renames it also means some > work to keep workspace compatibility. Eclipse Platform guarantees workspace > compatibility even on API breaks. There is no such policy (AFAIK) for > non-platform projects but in my opinion workspace compatibility should be > kept at the very least with the previous minor release so there is always > an upgrade path. > > So I guess my question is: is there an impact on workspace compatibility and > if so is it addressed?
These bundles lived in the experimental CMake-support feature, so I guess only users that had that installed will be affected. The only bundle that stores workbench preferences is o.e.c.jsoncdb.core which was formerly o.e.c.cmake.is.core.
Thanks Martin. I don't think we need to worry about migrating workbench preferences from old to new names, the N&N is a more than adequate place for that because it is experimental.
Jonah _______________________________________________cdt-dev mailing listcdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxTo unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
|