Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] C/C++ Problem Markers question

OK.. add to list to fix in cdt 9, would be API breaking probably because errors parsers do not API to deal with columns at all

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxx> wrote:
It’s probably historical. I don’t think gcc gave column information 10+ years ago when we started.


From: <cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Alena Laskavaia <elaskavaia.cdt@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "elaskavaia.cdt@xxxxxxxxx" <elaskavaia.cdt@xxxxxxxxx>, "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, July 27, 2015 at 10:07 AM
To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [cdt-dev] C/C++ Problem Markers question

Anybody remembers/knows why we don't support marker character position
for problem markers? Java problems for example highlight only the part
of string relevant to an error while cdt all line. Our error parser
ignores gcc column information and even our marker generator API that
suppose to set column actually ignores it and set -1. So anybody knows why?

Back to the top