Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] support for remote autotools

Do we want to bring that down into the CDT (and make you a committer? ;).

I still have on my list of things to do is to create an IDE project where
we can put more general things like this but that¹s probably a few months


On 1/20/2014, 8:49 AM, "Greg Watson" <g.watson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>As a result of the summit last year, I separated the remote API out of
>PTP into it¹s own repo and namespace with no other PTP dependencies. I
>also provided an implementation directly on JSch. I hope this provides
>enough incentive for it to be used by other projects.
>On Jan 17, 2014, at 8:48 PM, Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> As the maintainer of the CDT Autotools plug-ins, if you are proposing
>>making the Autotools
>> plug-in remote-enabled by replacing existing calls with the new PTP
>> APIs (i.e. no external dependencies), I wouldn't have issues
>> as long as existing functionality is preserved. Any API, functionality,
>> or UI changes, however, would require closer scrutiny.
>> I noticed that Rafael M. posted to the ptp-dev list in March
>> of 2013 to offer help in adding PTP Autotools remote project support.
>>Perhaps you
>> could team up with him such that you could make changes to the
>>Autotools plug-ins
>> and he could add support on the RDT side if something isn't already in
>>the works
>> in PTP.
>> If you were instead planning on reviving my old proposal which used the
>> project location, that would require buy-in from Doug.  That proposal
>>was turned down,
>> even though it removed the external dependencies on RDT/RSE via proxy.
>>I should note that
>> I did bring it up for discussion at the 2013 CDT Summit and it didn't
>>gain any traction
>> though Greg Watson proposed creating the new platform interfaces.  You
>>would need a more
>> detailed proposal to get the right people's attention and approval.
>>There is the up-coming
>> 2014 CDT Summit at EclipseCon if you are planning on attending.
>> -- Jeff J. 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Rodrigo Fraxino Araujo" <rfaraujo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 7:23:12 AM
>>> Subject: [cdt-dev] support for remote autotools
>>> Hi,
>>> From what I am aware, there is not any support for remote operations
>>> into Autotools.  Im planning to implement this support by making use of
>>> the interface developed by the PTP team. They managed to make it
>>> independent of any remote services implementation, which imo would
>>> be ideal for such case
>>> Is there anyone already working on this? Would this contribution be
>>> welcomed by the CDT community?
>>> Thanks.
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Rodrigo.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cdt-dev mailing list
>>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdt-dev mailing list
>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>cdt-dev mailing list

Back to the top