Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] Help with Indexer Bug

The project doesn't have enough files so we can measure speed impact.  But
I asked the developer to let me know of any issues. I will keep you posted
with any useful info or observation.


Is there any noticeable impact on speed?

Also, does it add any incorrect values?  I'm not sure if the parsing
context when this option is enabled will be the
same as what the compiler will see.  In particular I don't know what
happens if you are editing a header then I don't
know the parsing that is triggered by this option would know about symbols
that were defined earlier in the compilation


On 13-10-03 11:57 AM, Guy.Bonneau@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I just tried with a  complex CDT project of a co-developer that had many
> unresolved symbol...And yes symbols are now resolved. That helped a lot.
> Thanks for the suggestion.
> Guy
> From:		 Andrew Eidsness <eclipse@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To:		 cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx,
> Date:		 2013-10-03 10:54
> Subject:		 Re: [cdt-dev] Help with Indexer Bug
> Sent by:		 cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Out of curiosity, do you run with 'Window - Preferences - C/C++' then
> "Follow unindexed header files when producing the
> outline view" enabled or disabled?
> This is a preference that I recently found (when trying to "modify the
> indexer code like Joseph did").  It seems that
> enabling this causes more header files to be indexed.  Normally (i.e.,
> other than during parsing) when a header is not
> found in the index, the fallback handling is to lookup the actual source
> reparse it.  The value of this preference
> seems to decide whether that "lookup the source" step returns the real
> source or an empty string.  The default setting
> is off (I guess to be faster), but I think I'm getting less unresolved
> errors with it enabled.
> This is just my observation of behaviour, I haven't actually studied the
> difference; which is why I'm curious about your
> setting.
> -Andrew
cdt-dev mailing list

Privileged and/or Confidential information may be contained in this
message. If you are not the addressee of this message, you may not
copy, use or deliver this message to anyone. In such event, you
should destroy the message and kindly notify the sender by reply
e-mail. It is understood that opinions or conclusions that do not
relate to the official business of the company are neither given
nor endorsed by the company.
Thank You.

Back to the top