Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] Bug ID 403404

Oh, I see. I didn't notice the bug number in the subject. Do you know of an open source Java implementation of 128-bit integers with EPL-compatible license? I'd like to avoid BigInteger since it's too heavy and inefficient.


On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 4:02 PM, David Wang <kuoweiwang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks. I already filed a bug and the ID on the subject. Do you want me to create another one?
I wonder what is the outlook for the bug, my code needs this thing to work.
Thanks again

From: Sergey Prigogin <eclipse.sprigogin@xxxxxxxxx>
To: David Wang <kuoweiwang@xxxxxxxxx>; CDT General developers list. <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2013 3:52 PM
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Bug ID 403404

This is most likely caused by the fact that ULONG_MAX cannot be represented by a Java long. Could you please file a bug.


On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 3:42 PM, David Wang <kuoweiwang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I discussed some potential eclipse indexing error at
It seems to be a bug in eclipse. I created a bug last month. Can someone please help and confirm
if this is an eclipse bug? and/or will it be fixed shortly?
Thanks a lot, my code heavily relies on this to be working correctly...


cdt-dev mailing list

Back to the top