Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] bindings for CPPASTNewExpression

> Resolving T in new T to a constructor is problematic. Consider the  
> following example: 
> [snip]
> I think we should follow the option #1 despite of the fact that it may  
> break some existing code that depends on resolving "new T" to a ctor  
> call. Formally this is not an API change since IASTName.resolveBinding  
> does not make a promise of what kind of binding the name resolves to. 

Thanks for your advice! I'm working on implementing option #1.

I filed to track
the issue


Back to the top